Patient and caregiver lived experiences and mental health service engagement during first-episode psychosis in Uganda: a longitudinal mixed-methods study protocol
Oroma, P.; SSEMATA, A. S.; Ssembajjwe, W.; Auma, R.; Balinga, S.; Aujo, B. T.; Kaddu, A. K.; Ampiire, M.; Muhwezi, W.; Mwesiga, E. K.; Nakimuli-Mpungu, E.
Show abstract
Introduction: Engagement with mental health services (MHCS) during the first episode of psychosis (FEP) is critical for symptom control, quality of life, and relapse prevention. However, disengagement rates remain high in Uganda with severe consequences for patients and caregivers. This study protocol describes a mixed-methods investigation which aims to examine the relationship between patients and caregivers lived experiences and mental health service engagement during first-episode psychosis. Methods and Analysis. The mixed-methods study will recruit 82 patients with first-episode psychosis and their primary caregivers from Butabika National Referral Mental Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. Inclusion criteria are ages 18-60, less than 12 weeks on antipsychotic medications, living in the greater Kampala Metropolitan Area, with a consenting caregiver. Caregivers must be an adult (> 18years) providing full-time care for at least 6 months prior. Patients with substance use disorders will be excluded. Qualitative data on the lived experiences of patients and caregivers will be collected using the draw-write-and-tell method, while quantitative data on service engagement and associated factors will be collected using semi-structured questionnaires. The data will be analysed using Stata version 18, and participants will be reimbursed for their time. Ethics and Dissemination. Ethical clearance has been obtained from the School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (SOMREC) Ref: Mak-SOMREC-2024-1002 and institutional approval from Butabiika National Referral Mental Hospital. All participants will provide informed consent prior to participation. Data will be de-identified and securely stored, with results disseminated through peer-reviewed academic publications, conferences and community stakeholder workshops.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Studying the context of psychoses to improve outcomes in Ethiopia (SCOPE): protocol paper 96%
- Mapping young people’s journeys through mental health services: a prospective longitudinal qualitative study protocol 95%
- Shared decision-making interventions in the choice of antipsychotic prescription in people living with psychosis (SHAPE): protocol for a realist review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- NHS CHECK: protocol for a cohort study investigating the psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers 95%
- Study protocol for the development and internal validation of SPIRIT (Schizophrenia Prediction of Resistance to Treatment): A clinical tool for predicting risk of treatment resistance to anti-psychotics in First Episode Schizophrenia 94%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 94%
- Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 94%
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 94%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.