Causal Network Mapping of sEEG Identifies Compact Epileptogenic Targets Concordant with Seizure Freedom: Multicenter Validation in 60 Patients

Background and Purpose: Drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) affects approximately 15 million people worldwide, and surgery remains the only curative option. A key challenge in predicting outcomes is the lack of standardized, quantitative tools to help distinguish seizure driver regions from responder regions during stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) recordings. We validated the CN Suite, a computational platform that uses causal network mapping and machine learning to assign criticality scores to sEEG contacts, testing whether higher scores correspond to surgically treated tissue in patients with favorable outcomes. Methods: We analyzed deidentified clinical data from 60 patients (aged 2 years and older) with focal or multifocal DRE who underwent sEEG monitoring and proceed to surgery at four U.S. Level 4 epilepsy centers. The algorithm was trained on an independent cohort (N=37) and locked prior to validation. The primary outcome was the standardized effect size (Cohens d) of the patient level surgical zone enrichment ratio between more favorable (Engel I or II) and less favorable (Engel III or IV) outcome groups. Contact level sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were evaluated at a prelocked threshold. Results: The findings support our hypothesis: the algorithm results showed significantly higher criticality values for surgically treated tissue in favorable outcome patients (d=0.74, 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.06, p=0.003). Three potentially clinically actionable findings emerged. First, high-criticality contacts formed spatially compact clusters (~9 mm nearest-neighbor distance vs. 17mm expected by chance), consistent with focal targets amenable to minimally invasive ablation. Second, sensitivity was highest in small focal procedures (80% at 10 or fewer treated contacts) and decreased with resection size. Third, in patients whose surgery failed, high-critical tissue remained outside the resection boundary, suggesting incomplete treatment coverage of the epileptogenic zone rather than mislocalization. Prediction specificity was 84% at the contact level. For adult and pediatric cases (n=28), 88% of contacts that were identified as seizure free were in fact seizure free. Conclusions: Causal network mapping of sEEG identifies compact epileptogenic targets that correspond to surgically treated tissue in patients with more favorable outcomes. CN-Suite performed best in focal procedures and may be best suited for LITT and other minimally invasive approaches. In addition, low-criticality regions were infrequently associated with seizure-generating tissue, particularly in the pediatric cohort although our sample size was small. When surgery failed, residual high-critical tissue outside the resection boundary offered both a mechanistic explanation for less favorable surgical outcome as well as a potential target for reoperation.