Back

Home-based tDCS as an add-on to digital cognitive behavioral therapy application (dCBT app) in adults with ADHD: A sham-controlled randomized pilot study

Kerkel, K.; Reissmann, A.; Treml, L.; Schecklmann, M.; Jacob, G.; Osnabruegge, M.; Langguth, B.; Schoisswohl, S.

2026-05-22 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.05.21.26353771 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Introduction: Over 30% of adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) show an insufficient response to standard pharmacological treatments, which underscores the need for evidence-based alternative interventions. Methods: In this sham-controlled study, 30 adult outpatients with ADHD were randomized to 12 weeks of active or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as add-on to a digital cognitive behavioral therapy application (dCBT app). Participants received either active (2 mA, 20 min/day, 5 days/week) or sham tDCS with anodal (left) and cathodal (right) stimulation applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). In parallel, access to the dCBT app was provided for three months. ADHD symptoms were measured before and after treatment and after a three-month follow-up using the Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS v1.1). Results: All scales showed an improvement over time with medium-to-large within-subjects effects (Cohens d: -.48 to -.75), irrespective of group allocation. Two additional sensitivity analyses including (1) participants with over 75% of planned (sham)-tDCS sessions and (2) those who logged into the dCBT app on at least 5 days (median split) confirmed results. Response was observed in 1/15 (6.7%) of the tDCS group and 2/15 (13.3%) of the sham-tDCS group, with no difference between groups (p = .543, phi = -.111). Compliance to (sham-)tDCS was high. tDCS usability was rated marginally lower in the tDCS group. Conclusions: tDCS as an add-on therapy could not produce additional improvement in ADHS symptoms. The results are discussed in terms of contextual and patient-related aspects. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06766214.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
2
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.3%
3
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
4
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
6
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
11
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
12
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
14
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
19
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
21
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
22
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
24
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
25
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
26
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
30
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%