Back

Cross-Platform Assessment of Sub-50 nm Nanopipette Emitters for Native Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

Byrd, E. J.; Olivares, E. J.; Heidersbach, Z. J.; Kensil, M.; Wuyang, L.; Melani, R. D.; Actis, P.; Loo, R. R. O.; Sobott, F.; Calabrese, A. N.; Loo, J. A.

2026-05-23 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.05.20.726677 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Native mass spectrometry (nMS) is well established for measuring protein masses and stoichiometries using nano-electrospray ionization (nESI), yet salt adduction and source activation energies can limit routine measurements. In this study, we benchmark submicron quartz nanopipette nESI emitters (<50 nm internal diameter) across three mass spectrometry platforms (quadrupole-time-of-flight, quadrupole-Orbitrap, and tribrid-Orbitrap platforms) and a wide protein mass range (17-800 kDa). We analysed holo-myoglobin (17 kDa) over a range of concentrations (10 M-10 nM) and capillary voltages to determine limits of detection and define a gentle operating regime. We additionally observe reduced Na+ adduction and preservation of the Zn2+-bound metalloproteoform of carbonic anhydrase II (29 kDa). Proteins and protein complexes spanning the mid-to-high mass range including ovalbumin ([~]44 kDa), malate dehydrogenase ([~]70 kDa), glutamate dehydrogenase ([~]350 kDa), {beta}-galactosidase ([~]465 kDa), and GroEL ([~]800 kDa), were readily detected using nanopipette emitters. Compared with conventional 1-2 m internal diameter borosilicate emitters, quartz nanopipettes provided higher signal-to-noise ratios and fewer adducts. Finally, direct analysis of clarified bacterial lysate expressing -synuclein yielded a clear monomeric charge-state distribution, demonstrating compatibility with complex biological matrices. Collectively, these results establish quartz nanopipette nESI as an instrument-portable, salt-tolerant approach suitable for routine nMS analysis across a broad range of protein molecular weights and sample complexities.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
4
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
8
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
15
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
25
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
26
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%