Back

3D bioprinting of engineered living materials in support slurries for complex free-standing structures

Gona, R. S.; Cai, H.; Olland, M.; Gangan, M. S.; Bennett, D. T.; Mehta, U. O.; Silberstein, M. N.; Meyer, A. S.

2026-05-21 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.05.20.726626 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The combination of synthetic biology and additive manufacturing has driven major changes in production of biomaterials, especially through the use of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting to create engineered living materials. However, current fabrication methods can be limited by prohibitive hardware costs and the inability to maintain structural fidelity in complex, free-form living architectures. This work demonstrates how to build a low-cost, open-source 3D bioprinting platform that can make complicated bacterial structures with complex geometry and high dimensional accuracy. A commercially available, conventional fused deposition modeling 3D printer was modified to create a bioprinting system that is simple to build. The modified bioprinter, which costs around $450, is less expensive than many commercial bioprinters. This 3D-printing technology uses slurry-based support bath methods featuring low-cost gelatin and agarose microparticles, resulting in structures with a high aspect ratio (>8:1) and feature sizes as small as 260 m. The optimization of critical printing settings, including the ability of the bioink to retract during non-print movements, resulted in a reduction of unwanted bacterial deposition by nearly two orders of magnitude. Long-term viability experiments showed that bacteria in the bioprints could survive for at least 28 days with nutrient supplementation. Additionally, 3D-printed engineered biofilms revealed that incubation conditions and extracellular matrix composition significantly impacted the mechanical properties of printed constructs, with tradeoffs between matrix production and mechanical integrity. This study showcases an accessible 3D bioprinting platform for advanced bioprinting technologies, enabling development of engineered living materials with potential applications in synthetic biology, biotechnology, and tissue engineering.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
2
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.0%
3
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
4
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.6%
6
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
8
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
11
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
13
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
17
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
19
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
21
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.9%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
26
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%