Back

A Competitive Framework for Modeling EEG Microstate Durations

GOMEZ, C. M.; Angulo Ruiz, B. Y.

2026-05-22 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.20.726605 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThis study examines a competition-based model (C-model) designed to capture the temporal dynamics of successive brain microstates derived from electroencephalography (EEG) recordings during eyes-open conditions. The analyzed data were obtained from a public repository comprising microstate sequences from 60 sessions of a single subject [1]. When applied to microstate dynamics, the C-model posits a stochastic competition among neural circuits underlying the expression of individual microstates. MethodsThe model is formulated at a conceptual level (computational level in Marrs framework) and employs a geometric distribution to account for the long right tail of microstate duration distributions, interpreted as the probability of "failure" of the currently active microstate to persist. To account for the short-lived left tail, the model incorporates a transient increase in the stability of the currently active network, or equivalently, a temporary decrease in the activation probability of competing microstates (refractory period). ResultsThe model provides a good fit to the microstate duration distributions across all 60 sessions. One third of sessions showed microstate identity sequential dependency with respect to the previous microstates. DiscussionThese results suggest that the C-model captures key aspects of microstate temporal structure. Moreover, because microstate probabilities can be modulated by psychophysiological conditions--including the influence of previously active networks--the model may serve as a building block for more comprehensive neurobiological frameworks of neural and behavioral dynamics. In such frameworks, microstate sequences could emerge from structured competition and flow among neural networks supporting microstate expression.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.0%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.3%
3
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
5
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
6
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
7
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
14
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
21
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
22
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
24
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
25
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
28
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
30
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%