Back

Synthesis and Characterisation of a Macrophage-derived Hybrid Nanoparticles for Doxorubicin Delivery to Glioblastoma

Dabkeviciute, G.; Celia, C.; Petrikaite, V.

2026-05-22 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.20.726551 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) presents significant therapeutic challenges due to its aggressive nature, complex microenvironment and the limitations of conventional drug delivery systems. In this study, hybrid nanoparticles were developed by combining synthetic liposomes with macrophage-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) to harness the strengths of both platforms. Two distinct liposomal formulations, DPPC:Chol:DSPE-mPEG2000 (F1) and DPPC:DPPS:Chol:DSPE-mPEG2000 (F2), were used as the basis for the synthesis. EVs derived from J774 macrophages were integrated with F1 and F2 to create hybrid nanoparticles (H-F1 and H-F2). Doxorubicin (DOX) was encapsulated using a pH gradient and a remote loading procedure. The mean particle size of H-F1-DOX and H-F2-DOX was 158.2 {+/-} 1 nm and 162.8 {+/-} 9 nm, respectively. The polydispersity index (PDI) was 0.130 {+/-} 0.012 and 0.084 {+/-} 0.033, while the zeta potential values were -14.9 {+/-} 0.7 mV and -26.7 {+/-} 3.1 mV, respectively. H-F2-DOX exhibited the highest encapsulation efficiency (EE%), reaching 76.5{+/-}3.4%. The encapsulated hybrids remained stable up to one week, at +5{degrees}C. The release of DOX from H-F2-DOX in DMEM supplemented with 10% serum showed pH sensitivity, with total DOX release of 64.9 {+/-} 5.3% at pH 7.4 and 90.7 {+/-} 6.5% at pH 5.5. The cell viability assay demonstrated that all formulations exhibited strong cytotoxic effects against GBM cells under normoxic conditions, with H-F2-DOX showing the most potent effect under hypoxia-mimetic conditions.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.7%
3
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
4
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
5
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
6
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
8
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
10
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
11
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
14
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
21
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
22
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
24
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
25
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
27
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
29
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%