Back

Adoption of Guided Structured Reporting in Routine Radiological Practice: A Six-Week Multi-Site Implementation Study in the UAE

Lorenz, D.; Jansen, S.; Knoche, J.; Wolf-Sebottendorff, R.; Awad, H. J.; Toker, I.

2026-05-22 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.20.26353646 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Guided structured reporting has been proposed to address the limited availability of structured data in radiology, yet empirical evidence on its real-world adoption across users and imaging modalities remains scarce. Objective. To describe the adoption dynamics of a guided structured reporting system across multiple users and imaging modalities during a six-week implementation period. Methods. Retrospective observational study at two public tertiary hospitals in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. A guided structured reporting system was deployed for computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and mammography. Seven radiologists participated. The primary outcome was active in-software reporting time, recorded via system logs of mouse and keyboard interaction. Temporal trends in median reporting time per modality and individual user trajectories were analysed descriptively. After predefined data cleaning, 126 reports were included (84 CT, 27 MRI, 15 mammography). Results. Active in-software reporting time decreased across all modalities. Median reporting time fell from 130 s to 56 s for CT, from 383 s to 60 s for MRI, and from 126 s to 46 s for mammography (week 1 to week 6). Individual trajectories showed similar patterns, with the largest reductions during the early implementation phase. Subgroup analyses were limited by small sample sizes. Conclusions. Guided structured reporting was integrated into routine clinical workflows with temporal reductions in active reporting time across users and modalities, providing empirical evidence on the feasibility of workflow-integrated structured reporting in radiological practice.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
20.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.2%
4
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
5
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
6
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
8
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
14
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
16
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
28
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%