Back

The recreational-to-habitual shift in psychostimulant use is an economic demand parameter that is unrelated to drug consumption levels (under normal and punishment conditions).

Job, M. O.; Madhuranthakam, I. M.; Ahmed, S.; Basak, K.; Uddin, A.; Tumpa, M. A. A.; Jimenez, A. M.; Cherry, R.; Rodriguez, A. D.; Chowdhury, M.; Keck, T. M.

2026-05-21 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.19.726350 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RationaleThe progression of psychostimulant abuse is associated with a shift from recreational to habitual use (R2H-shift). Because this R2H-shift can be modeled using behavioral economics, we developed a novel Behavioral Economic model for the Analysis of Self-administration Time-curve (BEAST) to obtain R2H-shift variable(s). The relationship(s) between R2H-shift variables and drug intake (under normal and/or punishment conditions) is/are unknown. Our goal was to determine if the R2H-shift variable and intake variables obtained during the initial self-administration training phase were related to 1) drug intake at that time, and subsequent drug intake under 2) normal, 3) punishment, 4) post-punishment, and 5) price-constrained conditions. MethodLong Evans rats self-administered methamphetamine (METH, males n = 16, females n = 14), sucrose (males n = 22, females n = 22) and/or saline (males n = 3, females n = 10) under FR1 for 6 h per day for 20 days to obtain 1) followed by the assessment of subsequent drug intake under different conditions (2-5 above). We obtained all variables referenced above. We determined the relationships between all variables (multivariate analysis). ResultsThere were no sex differences detected in the METH and sucrose studies. For METH and sucrose, prior drug intake levels could predict drug intake under normal/punishment but not under price-constrained conditions. The R2H-shift variable could predict drug intake under a consumption-price curve but could not predict intake under normal/punishment conditions. ConclusionsWhile related to economic demand, the recreational-to-habitual shift rate was unrelated to drug intake levels (under normal and punishment conditions).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
20.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.2%
3
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
9
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
12
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
13
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
14
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
16
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
18
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
23
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%