Back

Heterogeneity-driven adaptive scale graph learning for subcellular spatial transcriptomics

Shi, W.; Shen, C.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, Q.; Luo, J.

2026-05-21 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.19.726162 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationSpatial transcriptomics enables gene expression profiling within intact tissue sections, providing an important basis for analyzing tissue organization, cellular heterogeneity, and microenvironmental interactions. However, existing spatial structure identification methods often integrate spatial information using fixed neighborhoods or predefined smoothing scales, which limits their ability to adapt to region-specific structural heterogeneity. In homogeneous regions, broader spatial smoothing can help preserve continuous tissue structures, whereas in regions with complex boundaries or mixed cell populations, excessive smoothing may obscure local expression differences and fine-scale structural changes. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an adaptive graph learning framework that can adjust the range of spatial information integration according to tissue structural heterogeneity. ResultsIn this study, we propose HAST, a heterogeneity-driven adaptive-scale graph learning framework for spatial transcriptomics. HAST adaptively determines graph filtering scales according to spatial structural heterogeneity, enabling flexible information aggregation across different tissue regions. It further decomposes gene expression signals into low-frequency structural components and high-frequency residual components, thereby jointly modeling global spatial continuity and local expression variations. Experiments on high-resolution spatial transcriptomics datasets show that HAST improves spatial structure identification and cross-section generalization. Tumor-enriched cluster identification and neighborhood enrichment analysis further demonstrate its ability to characterize tumor-associated spatial regions and microenvironmental organization.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
23.4%
2
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
13.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.5%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
8
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.4%
13
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
16
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
20
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
23
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%