Ambient AI Documentation in Mixed-Language Encounters: A Heuristic Evaluation of Spanish-English and Mandarin-English Conversations
Hu, D.; Flores, D.; Flores, L.; Chien, R.; Lam, K.; Chow, E.; Guo, Y.; Tam, S.; Perret, D.; Pandita, D.; Zheng, K.
Show abstract
Ambient AI documentation systems rely on automatic speech recognition to transcribe patient-provider conversations before generating clinical notes. However, little empirical evidence exists on how these systems perform in mixed-language clinical encounters. We conducted a mixed-method heuristic evaluation of an ambient AI documentation tool using 24 reenacted primary care conversations involving Spanish-English and Mandarin-English code-switching. Quantitative analyses measured mixed error rate (MER) and code-switching detection. Overall MER was low, with a median of 4% and less variation in Spanish-English conversations, and 9% in Mandarin-English conversations, but with outliers reaching 67%. The system generally detected language switches reliably, although deletions occurred frequently in Mandarin-English transcripts at switch points. Qualitative analysis revealed transcription errors related to phonetic similarity, automatic language translation, clinical terminology recognition, and language-specific challenges. These findings highlight considerations for improving ambient AI clinical documentation systems to support multilingual providers in delivering care for linguistically diverse populations.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Anti-LGBTQIA+ Medical Bias in Large Language Models 94%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 92%
- Natural language processing to evaluate texting conversations between patients and healthcare providers during COVID-19 Home-Based Care in Rwanda at scale 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Annotation-preserving machine translation of English corpora to validate Dutch clinical concept extraction tools 93%
- Empowering Personalized Pharmacogenomics with Generative AI Solutions 93%
- Generative Large Language Models in Electronic Health Records for Patient Care Since 2023: A Systematic Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-Generated Clinical Summaries: Errors and Susceptibility to Speech and Speaker Variability 95%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 89%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting Goals of Care Conversations in Clinical Notes with Active Learning 94%
- Development of a Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) Symptom Lexicon Using Electronic Health Record Clinical Notes 92%
- Developing A Deep Learning Natural Language Processing Algorithm For Automated Reporting Of Adverse Drug Reactions 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.