Back

Therapeutic Alliance and Treatment Outcomes Among Patients with Depression in Benue State

Onah, C.; Ogwuche, C. H.; Otumala, B. O.

2026-05-22 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.05.19.26353601 medRxiv
Show abstract

Depression remains a major public health concern globally, particularly in low resource settings where access to quality mental health care is limited and treatment outcomes are often suboptimal. In this context, the quality of the clinician patient relationship has been increasingly recognised as a critical determinant of therapeutic success. This study examined the influence of clinician patient therapeutic alliance and relational factors on treatment outcomes among patients with depression in Benue State, Nigeria. A crosssectional correlational design was adopted, involving patients diagnosed with depression and receiving care in selected health facilities. Data were analysed using Structural Equation Modelling to test hypothesised relationships among therapeutic alliance, relational factors, and treatment outcomes. The measurement model demonstrated strong psychometric properties, with all factor loadings exceeding 0.60, composite reliability above 0.90, and adequate convergent and discriminant validity. Results revealed that therapeutic alliance significantly predicted treatment outcomes, while relational factors also had a significant positive effect. Therapeutic alliance further significantly predicted relational factors. The model explained 61 percent of the variance in treatment outcomes. Mediation analysis indicated that relational factors partially mediated the relationship between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes, accounting for 29 percent of the total effect. The study concludes that therapeutic alliance, strengthened through trust, empathy, and collaboration, plays a central role in improving depression outcomes. Strengthening relational competencies in clinical practice is therefore essential for enhancing mental health care delivery in Nigeria.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
41.5%
2
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
3
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
5
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
6
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
8
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
9
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.6%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
17
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
26
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%