The Telesafe archive: creating a database of UK primary care telephone consultations
Edwards, P. J.; Caddick, B.; Skeen, A.; Lin, J.; Ridd, M. J.; Barnes, R. K.; Salisbury, C.
Show abstract
Background In 2024, one-third of GP appointments in England were conducted by telephone. What happens during these consultations is largely unknown. Aim To test the feasibility of collecting recorded GP telephone consultations with linked data and consent for future research use. Design and setting Retrospective observational study in seven practices in South West England. Method Adults who had a telephone consultation at practices that routinely record calls were invited to consent to retrieval of call audio, a 4-month electronic health record (EHR) extract and a post-consultation patient questionnaire. Practice-level consent rates were analysed using regression models. Results Of 28 clinicians recruited, 19 GPs had consultations with patients whose recordings were retrievable, usable, and consented for future research. Of 2,053 invitations, 123 patients consented (6.0%). Consent was lower in more deprived practices (IMD 1-2 vs 9-10: OR=0.22, 95CI=0.09-0.54). Of 101 recordings retrieved, 96 were usable and 91 had consent for future research. 86/91 were linked to EHRs and 89/91 to post-consultation patient questionnaires. Mean consultation duration was 7 minutes 13 seconds; audible typing was heard in 69% (63/91). 161 problems were discussed (mean 1.77 per consultation). Most patients were happy their consultation was by telephone (96/117, 82%), although the majority reported usually preferring face-to-face appointments (68/115, 59%). Conclusion It is feasible to assemble a reusable archive of GP telephone consultations with linked data. However, recruitment was low using retrospective remote consent. Future work should test alternative recruitment approaches, particularly to improve patient engagement at practices serving deprived populations.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 96%
- Targeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: randomised controlled trial 96%
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 96%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 94%
- Teleconferencing as an alternative to written Advice and Guidance referrals at the primary-secondary care interface: a qualitative case study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 96%
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 95%
- Primary care use of laboratory tests in Northern Ireland Western Health and Social Care Trust: a cross-sectional study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 94%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 93%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVI-Prim survey: Challenges for Austrian and German general practitioners during initial phase of COVID-19 95%
- Feasibility trial of a new digital training package to enhance primary care practitioners' communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism 94%
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.