Back

Determinants of cancer care delays in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)

Dusingize, J. C.; Zotova, N.; Kabarriti, R.; Sehrawat, K.; Babakazo, P.; Alisho, A. S.; Kasindi, F. L.; Yessoufou, I.; Yotebieng, M.

2026-05-26 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.19.26353550 medRxiv
Show abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa are driven by delayed diagnosis and treatment initiation. We evaluated the magnitude and determinants of diagnostic and treatment delays among cancer patients in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). METHODS: We conducted a hospital-based cross-sectional study of 460 adults with confirmed cancer at Nganda Hospital Center in Kinshasa, DRC. Two outcomes were assessed: delay from symptom onset to diagnosis and delay from diagnosis to treatment initiation. Log-normal regression models were fitted for each outcome to estimate adjusted geometric mean ratios (aGMRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Covariates included demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, behavioral, and stigma-related factors. RESULTS: The median age was 55 years, and 76.2% of participants were women. Overall, 55.0% of participants experienced symptom-to-diagnosis delays >6 months, and 49.4% experienced diagnosis-to-treatment delays >3 months. Older age was associated with longer diagnostic delay (aGMR 1.55, 95% CI 1.03-2.31) and treatment delay (1.51, 1.07-2.14). Unemployment was strongly associated with both diagnostic delay (1.68, 1.15-2.47) and treatment delay (2.27, 1.54-3.33), as was hepatitis B co-infection (1.88, 1.06-3.34 and 2.42, 1.15-5.11, respectively). Longer diagnostic delay was additionally associated with informal trading (1.99, 1.21-3.28), taxi or motorbike transport (1.92, 1.25-2.94), and smoking history (2.25, 1.03-4.91), while high cancer-stereotype stigma was associated with longer treatment delay (1.56, 1.04-2.34). CONCLUSION: Substantial delays exist across the DRC cancer care continuum, driven by socioeconomic vulnerability, transport barriers, hepatitis B co-infection, and cancer-related stigma. These findings highlight the need for integrated interventions to improve timely diagnosis and treatment initiation, including strengthening financial protection, decentralizing cancer services, and reducing stigma in cancer care.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.7%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.2%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
4
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
9
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
10
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
11
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
14
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
16
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
17
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
19
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
25
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%