Back

Irreversible electroporation associated with improved overall survival vs standard of care for stage 3 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Martin, R. C. G.; White, R. R.; Bilimoria, M. M.; Narayanan, G.; Kluger, M. D.; Iannitti, D. A.; Polanco, P. M.; Hammill, C. W.; Cleary, S. P.; Heithaus, R. E.; Welling, T.; Chan, C. H. F.

2026-05-21 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.19.26353144 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Emerging evidence suggests irreversible electroporation (IRE) with standard-of-care (SOC) chemo-therapy may improve survival in patients with Stage 3 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) when compared to SOC alone. This study evaluates the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of Stage 3 PDAC patients treated with SOC plus IRE with the NanoKnife System versus SOC alone. Methods This prospective, multicenter study included two cohorts from the DIRECT registry: an IRE cohort from sites offering IRE as part of clinical care, and a comparator SOC cohort of prospectively enrolled and contemporaneous retrospective patients. Enrollment spanned 08/05/2019 to 02/05/2023, with follow-up through at least 24 months, death, or loss to follow-up. Included were 137 patients (99 IRE; 38 SOC), aged [&ge;]18 years with Stage 3 PDAC and no progression after three months of SOC therapy. Results Median (interquartile range) time from diagnosis to enrollment was 8 (6-10) months for IRE and 4 (3-6) for SOC (p<0.0001). Median OS and PSF from enrollment were 18 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15-24) months and 9 (95% CI: 7-12) months for IRE, and 10 (95% CI: 8-14) months and 6 (5-8) months for SOC, respectively (p<0.0001 and p=0.009). Adverse events occurred in 80% (79/99) of IRE patients and 95% (36/38) of SOC patients; 29% (29/99) of the IRE cohort experiencing an IRE-related adverse event. Conclusions IRE was associated with improved OS versus SOC alone and may be an effective consolidative treatment for Stage 3 PDAC after three months of induction chemotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
2
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
7
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
10
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
12
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
14
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
15
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
18
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
19
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%