Back

A Systematic Comparison of tTIS Optimization Approaches for Focal Neuromodulation

ghanem, p.; Rampersad, S.; Yarossi, M.; Dorval, A.; Brooks, D.; Moharrer, A.

2026-05-21 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.18.726031 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) is a promising non-invasive brain stimulation technique that has the potential to selectively modulate deep brain regions by delivering two high-frequency alternating currents that interfere to produce a low-frequency amplitude-modulated envelope at the target. A key challenge in deploying tTIS is finding electrode current patterns that are simultaneously effective, focal, and safe. This is a fundamentally non-convex optimization problem for which a number of methods have recently been proposed. However, no systematic comparison of these methods across a large and diverse set of brain targets has been performed, leaving practitioners without clear guidance on how best to optimize for a particular experimental setting. In this work, we present a comprehensive benchmarking study comparing seven tTIS optimization methods that have appeared in the literature in recent years: exhaustive search, genetic algorithm, multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOVEA), min-max optimization, convex TI (CVXTI), non-convex optimization with convex relaxations, and an unsupervised neural network. All methods were evaluated across 250 brain targets spanning cortical and subcortical gray matter and white matter regions in five finite element head models. Each method was evaluated on two key metrics: mean electric field strength within the target region of interest, and off-target stimulated brain volume. Results were stratified by tissue type and target depth to identify systematic performance differences. Based on these results, we provide practical evidence-based recommendations for optimization method selection among these seven methods depending on target location, tissue type, and available computation time. Moreover we provide the code base that will allow other investigators to use these methods for their own applications. Our goal is to provide researchers and clinicians with a clear, evidence-based framework for choosing a tTIS optimization method suited to their specific target and application.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.