Back

Using Mapping-Profiles to Refine Strain-Level Metagenomic Classification

Lipovac, J.; Angevin, L.; Krizanovic, K.

2026-05-20 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.18.725856 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Metagenomic classification at the strain level remains challenging due to high sequence similarity among closely related genomes, which leads to ambiguous read mappings and frequent false-positive strain detections. Reducing such errors improves the reliability of strain-level analyses, which is critical for applications such as pathogen detection. We introduce StrainRefine, a post-mapping refinement method that analyzes read-reference mapping profiles to resolve ambiguous assignments among highly similar genomes. The method represents candidate reference genomes using binary profiles that capture read-support patterns and measures similarity between references based on profile overlap. The method clusters references based on similar mapping profiles, filters weakly supported genomes, and reassigns reads to representative references, reducing redundant reporting of near-identical strains. StrainRefine substantially reduces false-positive strain detections while preserving recall and improving agreement between predicted and true abundance profiles. On large-scale metagenomic datasets, it achieves a substantially improved precision-recall balance compared to existing mapping-based approaches, with the standalone method obtaining the highest read-level classification accuracy on the most complex evaluated dataset. Unlike many strain-level tools designed for individual species, StrainRefine operates without prior assumptions about sample composition or curated species-specific reference collections, while still achieving comparable performance in single-species settings on species-specific reference databases. These results highlight mapping-profile similarity as an effective signal for improving strain-level metagenomic classification.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.1%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.1%
4
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
5
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
6
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
8
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
9
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
11
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
12
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
14
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
16
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
17
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
20
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
23
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%