Back

Personal Care Products and Incident Hypertension: Prospective Cohort Study of U.S. Women

Lim, J.; Chang, C.-J.; White, A.; Goodney, G.; Wang, H.; Joo, J.; Roger, V. L.; Sandler, D. P.; Wong, J. Y.

2026-05-21 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.18.26353536 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Over half of U.S. women have hypertension, a strong but modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Personal care products (PCPs) are widely used in daily life and contain endocrine disrupting chemicals that can alter hormonal regulation of blood pressure. However, the relationship between PCPs and hypertension has not been well studied. We investigated whether patterns of PCP use were associated with incident hypertension in a large prospective cohort study of U.S. women. Methods: Sister Study participants were recruited in 2003-2009 and followed until September 30, 2021. Usage frequency of 41 PCPs in the 12 months before baseline was self-reported. Latent class analyses identified groups with similar PCP use patterns ("infrequent," "moderate," or "frequent"). At baseline, we excluded women with prevalent hypertension, antihypertensive medication users, or those missing hypertension status. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate associations between PCP use and incident self-reported hypertension. Results: During a mean follow-up of 11.4 years, 10,099 women developed hypertension. Frequent PCP use was associated with higher hypertension risk [HR=1.08 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.13); p-trend=0.003], with a 4.1% population attributable risk. Frequent users of beauty products had higher risk than infrequent users [HR=1.11 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.16)]. Moderate and frequent users of hygiene products also had increased risk [HR=1.07 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.13); HR=1.13 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.19)]. Conclusions: Frequent PCP use, especially beauty and hygiene products, was associated with incident hypertension. Our findings implicate everyday chemicals as modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and highlight the need to identify pathogenic components in widely used consumer products.

Matching journals

The top 15 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.