Body-focused repetitive behaviours in adolescents: a common and under-recognised source of distress and unmet need
Mackay, C. E.; Waite, P.; Lee, L.; Haines, H.; Toher, M.; OxWell Study Team, ; Fazel, M.
Show abstract
Background: Body-focused repetitive behaviours (BFRBs), including hair pulling, skin picking and nail biting, are common but under-recognised behaviours that often emerge during adolescence. Their prevalence, associated distress, and relationship with mental health and social factors remain poorly characterised. Methods: 5,437 adolescents aged 11-18 years reported engagement in BFRBs, associated distress, and functional interference as part of the 2025 OxWell Student Survey. Participants. Problematic BFRBs were defined as at least one BFRB with moderate or high distress. Associations with gender, neurodivergence, bullying, and internalising symptoms were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Overall, 58.5% of participants reported at least one BFRB. Nail biting was most common (43.6%), followed by skin picking (31.3%) and hair pulling (14.5%). Among those with BFRBs, 22.2% reported moderate-to-high distress, and 3.3% of the total sample reported the highest level of distress. Co-occurrence was common: more than half of those with BFRBs reported multiple behaviours. BFRBs were more common and more distressing in girls and trans/gender-diverse participants than in boys. Problematic BFRBs showed strong associations with internalising symptoms (6.3% in the normal range vs 34.2% in the clinical range) and bullying (9.6% with no bullying vs 27.1% with >weekly bullying). Internalising symptoms were the strongest predictor in multivariable models (OR 1.97 per 10-point increase), alongside independent contributions from gender and frequent bullying. Conclusions: BFRBs are common in adolescents, frequently co-occur, and are strongly associated with emotional distress and social adversity. Recognition of distress, rather than behaviour alone, may be important for identifying unmet need and guiding intervention.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Internalizing Problems Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Dutch Children and Adolescents with and without Pre-Existing Mental Health Problems 95%
- What Treatment Outcomes Matter Most? A Q-study of Outcome Priority Profiles Among Youth with Lived Experience of Depression 95%
- The Bidirectional Relationship Between Head Injuries and Conduct Problems: Longitudinal Modelling of a Population-Based Birth Cohort Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Prevalence of mental disorders in people with intellectual disabilities across the lifespan: an umbrella review 93%
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development 95%
- The lived experience of rejection sensitivity in ADHD - a qualitative exploration 95%
- Timing of parental depression on risk of child depression and poor educational outcomes: a population based routine data cohort study from Born in Wales, UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Parental income and psychiatric disorders from age 10 to 40: a genetically informative population study 94%
- How are children's perceptions of the home environment associated with a general psychopathology factor across childhood? 93%
- Childhood trajectories of emotional and behavioral difficulties are related to polygenic liability for mood and anxiety disorders 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coordination difficulties, IQ and psychopathology in children with high-risk Copy Number Variants 93%
- Maternal health around pregnancy and autism risk: a population-based study. 93%
- Social relationships and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analysis of the COVID-19 social study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.