Back

An interpretable and interactive clinical AI agent for personalized anti-infective decision support in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infection

Cao, X.; Shi, D.; Du, Z.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Q.

2026-05-19 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.18.26353005 medRxiv
Show abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) infections remain difficult to manage because treatment decisions must balance heterogeneous patient risk, limited antibiotic options, potential toxicity and emerging resistance. Clinical care in this setting requires not only single-endpoint risk prediction, but also decision-support frameworks that can jointly enable prognosis assessment, result interpretation, and individualized treatment comparison. Here we present Dr.BUG, an interactive clinical AI agent for personalized decision support in CRGNB infection. Dr.BUG integrates stable feature-set selection, multi-task prognostic modelling, interpretability analysis and model-based simulation of antibiotic regimen recommendation into a unified workflow. Using a development cohort, a temporally independent validation cohort, and external cohorts from the MIMIC-IV dataset, we developed and validated models for four clinically relevant tasks: clinical efficacy, survival outcome, polymyxin resistance and treatment duration. Model inputs were derived primarily from routinely available and relatively low-cost clinical variables, supporting translational feasibility. Across the major tasks, selected-feature models matched or exceeded the performance of their full-feature counterparts while using fewer variables, as reflected in 82.0% of optimized-metric comparisons in the development cohort, and remained robust in both temporal and external validation. Dr.BUG further provided both population-level and patient-level interpretability and generated individualized rankings of candidate antibiotic regimens. In the retrospective analysis of non-survivors, clinician review suggested that regimens recommended by Dr.BUG might be associated with higher predicted survival probabilities. These findings support a broader role for clinical AI in complex drug-resistant infections, extending its utility from offline risk prediction to interpretable, deployable, and personalized decision support.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.4%
3
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
5
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.7%
9
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.1%
11
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
24
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%