Back

T-cell Receptor (TCR) targeting with Multivalent T-cell Engagers

Paul, D.; Kulkarni, A.; Rodriguez, F.; Dahlberg, D.; Rozumalski, L.; Wagner, C. R.

2026-05-20 immunology
10.64898/2026.05.17.725710 bioRxiv
Show abstract

T-cell engagers (TCEs) for cancer immunotherapy have traditionally relied on high affinity single chain fragment variable (scFv) domains to target CD3, specifically the {varepsilon} chain, for the activation of T-cells. Despite their clinical success, there have been reports of TCEs driving systemic toxicity, non-specific T-cell activation, on-target off-tumor effects, and severe inflammation due to cytokine release. To address these limitations, we designed multivalent TCEs using Chemically Self-Assembled Nanorings (CSANs) that target the /{beta} constant region of the T-cell receptor (TCR) in the TCR/CD3 complex using a moderate affinity TCR nanobody (TCRVHH). Nanobodies offer superior physical and chemical properties over scFvs- including higher solubility, stability and lower production cost- making them increasingly popular as structural units of TCEs. We compared the efficacy and safety profile of this moderate affinity, nanobody-based TCR binder against high affinity CD3scFv based CSANs across EGFR and PSMA expressing solid tumor models. While the CD3scFv CSANs offered potent cytotoxicity, they also induced antigen independent T-cell activation bypassing the requirement of tumor crosslinking for cytotoxicity. In contrast the TCRVHH CSANs required strict antigen engagement to trigger cytotoxicity, significantly reducing non-specific T-cell activation and thus enhancing the safety profile. Although the initiation of cytotoxicity was kinetically slower than the CD3scFv counterpart, TCRVHH CSANs achieved comparable end point cytotoxicity across multiple antigen densities, as well as in 3D tumor spheroids. Through this study we demonstrate the applicability of nanobodies as T-cell targeting domains, enhanced specificity and safety of moderate affinity T-cells binders and the diversification of T-cell targeting epitopes without compromising the efficacy of TCEs.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.9%
5
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
11
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
14
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
16
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
22
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
25
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
29
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.5%
30
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%