Back

Convergent suppression of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation genes defines a pan-subtype signature in breast cancer: a multi-cohort transcriptomic study

Gomosani, A. A.; Marghalani, H.; Al Matar, L.

2026-05-20 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.17.725700 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBreast cancer exhibits extensive molecular heterogeneity across intrinsic subtypes, yet convergent metabolic reprogramming may represent an obligate feature of tumour initiation. We hypothesised that suppression of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation (FAO) constitutes such a convergence point, defining a shared metabolic phenotype independent of subtype. MethodsRNA-seq data from 1,106 primary breast tumours and 113 normal-adjacent tissues (TCGA-BRCA) were intersected with 1,079 nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes from MitoCarta 3.0. Differential expression was assessed using Welch t-test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction at all tumour stages, at Stage I specifically, and stratified across PAM50 subtypes. A 55-gene core FAO signature was derived by three-way intersection. Ten candidate genes were selected by pre-specified objective scoring, locked before any clinical testing. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed using MitoCarta 3.0 pathway annotations. Diagnostic performance, clinical associations, survival, and mutation independence were characterised. External validation used two independent GEO cohorts (GSE42568, n = 121; GSE109169, n = 50); prognostic validation used METABRIC (Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium; n = 1,980). DESeq2 was applied as methodological cross-validation. ResultsAmong 126 differentially expressed mitochondrial genes, fatty acid oxidation was the most significantly depleted pathway (normalised enrichment score -2.130; false discovery rate 0.001). The 55-gene core signature replicated in both external cohorts with 100% directional concordance (hypergeometric p < 10-{superscript 1}). All 10 candidate genes discriminated tumour from normal tissue (area under the curve 0.915-0.979) and demonstrated broad clinical associations. The composite FAO suppression score predicted overall survival in METABRIC (log-rank p = 7.82 x 10-) and MAOA achieved independent prognostic significance in multivariable Cox regression (hazard ratio 0.890; adjusted p = 0.009). DESeq2 cross-validation confirmed Spearman {rho} = 0.980 concordance. ConclusionsNuclear-encoded FAO suppression is a robust, pan-subtype feature of breast cancer detectable at Stage I and validated across independent platforms and cohorts. These 10 candidate genes constitute a consistent initiation-phase mitochondrial signature, implicating FAO suppression as a potential convergence point in breast cancer oncogenesis and motivating targeted functional investigation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.4%
3
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
6
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
7
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
10
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
12
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
13
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.4%
15
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
18
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
21
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%