Back

An Adjustable Offloading Ankle-Foot Orthosis: Design and Proof-of-Concept Biomechanical Verification

Saffuri, E.; Jordan Dotan, L.; Solav, D.

2026-05-20 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.05.17.725313 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Various ankle-foot conditions (e.g., fractures, diabetic foot ulcers, and post-surgical recovery) require periods of complete non-weightbearing followed by gradually increasing partial loadings. However, existing assistive devices often provide inconsistent or uncomfortable offloading during gait. Additionally, prolonged proximal leg offloading can contribute to muscle atrophy, reduced bone density, and overuse of other body segments. We present a novel offloading ankle-foot orthosis (OLAFO) designed to overcome these limitations. The OLAFO features a patient-specific load-bearing shank brace, designed through a digital workflow and fabricated from a 3D-printed core reinforced with carbon-fiber composite lamination. Interlocking serrated side struts, adjustable in 2 mm increments, modulate load sharing between the shank and plantar surfaces. Furthermore, the OLAFO incorporates contact plates with a rocker profile informed by roll-over-shape measurements to support forward progression and gait symmetry. Proof-of-concept biomechanical verification in one able-bodied participant evaluated complete offloading, five partial-loading levels, and normal gait using a pressure walkway to compute vertical ground reaction forces and impulses. In complete offloading, the affected foot generated no contact pressures. Across partial-loading levels, the foot impulse increased from 14% to 53% of the total load and scaled linearly with strut height adjustments, supporting clinician-prescribed loading increments. Contralateral stance duration increased only modestly compared to commonly used assistive devices, indicating reduced compensatory loading on the intact limb. These findings demonstrate the proof-of-concept feasibility of the OLAFO, highlighting its potential for verifying full offloading and prescribing partial-loading targets during rehabilitation. Future research will evaluate performance across patient populations and clinical rehabilitation tasks.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.5%
2
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.8%
6
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
8
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.9%
11
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
19
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%