Back

A direct forcing immersed boundary method for biofluid simulations using a non-linear rotation free shell model on unstructured grids

Kim, T.; Malipeddi, A. R.; Capecelatro, J.; Figueroa, A.

2026-05-19 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.05.16.725689 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Thin structures such as heart valves and aortic dissection flaps interact dynamically with blood flow in human vessels. Their flexibility and capacity for large deformations generate complex, highly transient hemodynamic patterns over the cardiac cycle. Accurately resolving these interactions remains challenging for conventional boundary-fitted fluid-structure interaction approaches. We present an immersed boundary method for simulating thin structures in incompressible flow on unstructured grids. The method couples a stabilized finite element fluid solver with a nonlinear, rotation-free shell formulation through a direct forcing immersed boundary approach. The framework supports both weak (explicit) and strong (implicit) time-coupling strategies, enabling stable simulations over a wide range of solid-to-fluid density ratios. Hydrodynamic forces acting on thin structures are computed from fluid solutions sampled on both sides of the structure, allowing accurate force reconstruction for zero-thickness shells. To our knowledge, this is the first immersed boundary formulation that couples an unstructured finite element fluid solver with a two-dimensional, rotation-free shell model to simulate interactions between thin structures and incompressible flow. Fluid-structure coupling is achieved using predefined finite element shape functions, which provide consistent projection between Eulerian and Lagrangian fields without additional interpolation procedures. The framework is validated using three-dimensional benchmark problems involving thin structures. Then, valve-like model is used to compare strong and weak coupling strategies. Finally, the method is applied to an idealized type-B aortic dissection model. The proposed approach is implemented within the open-source software CRIMSON, a finite element platform for cardiovascular simulation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
3
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
5
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
7
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
12
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
24
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%