Back

Modeling Complex Effects and Individual Variability in Multi-Paradigm fMRI with Nonlinear Mixed Models

Li, X.; Zhang, G.; Qu, G.; Orlichenko, A.; Ding, Z.; Wilson, T. W.; Stephen, J. M.; Calhoun, V. D.; Wang, Y.-P.

2026-05-19 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.05.16.725673 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data are inherently complex, characterized by high dimensionality, intricate inter-regional dependencies, and substantial individual variability across experimental paradigms. Traditional linear mixed models (LMMs) provide a principled framework that models population-level fixed effects while estimating variance components arising from subject-level random effects; however, they often fail to adequately capture nonlinear relationships inherent in neuroimaging data. To address these limitations, we introduce the nonlinear mixed model (NMM) approach, an innovative extension of the LMM framework that integrates neural networks to flexibly model complex fixed-effect relationships while preserving the random-effects structure to account for individual differences. NMM advances fMRI analysis by: (1) identifying robust functional connectivity (FC) patterns consistently observed across multiple paradigms; (2) leveraging SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to provide post-hoc interpretability of the nonlinear fixed effects, quantifying how age, sex, and paradigm contribute to predicted FC and how these effects are distributed across large-scale brain networks; and (3) using subject-specific random effects as neural fingerprints that not only show systematic variability across attention and default mode systems but also predict standardized cognitive scores, demonstrating biological relevance. Applied to the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC) across emotion, n-back, and resting-state paradigms, NMM achieved superior model fit relative to classical LMMs, as evidenced by lower mean squared error (MSE) in predicting FC. This framework offers a statistically rigorous and practically explainable approach for modeling large-scale FC from modest covariates while explicitly separating population-level effects from stable individual variability in functional brain organization.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.7%
2
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
19.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.0%
4
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.1%
7
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
8
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.4%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
13
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
15
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
18
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
19
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
20
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
21
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
22
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%