Back

Determination of the practical utility of ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT): mapping OncoKB level 1 alterations using ESCAT

Kordes, M.; Chakravarty, D.; Boberg, E.; Creignou, M.; de Petris, L.; Karlsson, C.; Burstrom, L. L.; Suehnholz, S.; Yachnin, J.; Wiklander, O. P.; Haglund de Flon, F.

2026-05-20 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.16.26353390 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) ranks genomic alterations by the evidence supporting the predictive value of the molecular target for response to targeted therapies. No openly available, systematically curated set of standard care biomarkers mapped to the ESCAT framework exists to support clinical decision-making or harmonize biomarker interpretation. Methods. We mapped all OncoKBTM Level 1 biomarkers to ESCAT tiers using evidence cited by OncoKBTM, excluding abstract-only data. Eight board-certified oncologists and hematologists independently assigned ESCAT tiers, with discrepancies resolved through structured consensus meetings. Recurring evidence scenarios that did not correspond to any existing ESCAT tier informed a set of a priori defined modifications, which were subsequently applied to biomarkers that could not be classified using native ESCAT criteria. Results. Of 188 OncoKBTM Level 1 biomarkers, 16 were excluded due to abstract-only evidence. Using native ESCAT criteria, 51% of the remaining biomarkers were classified as Tier 1, 3% Tier 2, 18% Tier 3, 6% Tier X and 22% could not be assigned to any tier. Applying the modified ESCAT criteria resolved all previously unclassifiable biomarkers and increased Tier 1 assignments to 73%. Inter-rater reliability (Krippendorffs alpha) was moderate (0.586) and 62% of classifications required consensus discussions. Comparison with ESCAT tiers reported in ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines showed improved concordance when using the modified criteria. Conclusions. The native ESCAT criteria are highly stringent, resulting in many FDA-recognized, clinically validated biomarkers that are currently assigned level 1 by OncoKBTM not mapping to any existing tier. Our predefined modifications improved alignment with OncoKBTM Level 1 designations and with published ESMO clinical practice guidelines. The mapped set of standard care biomarkers are provided on the OncoKBTM website, offering a practical resource that harmonizes ESCAT tiers of evidence with a widely adopted levels of evidence schema.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
5
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
6
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.4%
9
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
11
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
16
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 70%
1.0%
24
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
26
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Pharmacological Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%