Back

Determination of the practical utility of ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT): mapping OncoKB level 1 alterations using ESCAT

Kordes, M.; Chakravarty, D.; Boberg, E.; Creignou, M.; de Petris, L.; Karlsson, C.; Burstrom, L. L.; Suehnholz, S.; Yachnin, J.; Wiklander, O. P.; Haglund de Flon, F.

2026-05-20 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.16.26353390 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) ranks genomic alterations by the evidence supporting the predictive value of the molecular target for response to targeted therapies. No openly available, systematically curated set of standard care biomarkers mapped to the ESCAT framework exists to support clinical decision-making or harmonize biomarker interpretation. Methods. We mapped all OncoKBTM Level 1 biomarkers to ESCAT tiers using evidence cited by OncoKBTM, excluding abstract-only data. Eight board-certified oncologists and hematologists independently assigned ESCAT tiers, with discrepancies resolved through structured consensus meetings. Recurring evidence scenarios that did not correspond to any existing ESCAT tier informed a set of a priori defined modifications, which were subsequently applied to biomarkers that could not be classified using native ESCAT criteria. Results. Of 188 OncoKBTM Level 1 biomarkers, 16 were excluded due to abstract-only evidence. Using native ESCAT criteria, 51% of the remaining biomarkers were classified as Tier 1, 3% Tier 2, 18% Tier 3, 6% Tier X and 22% could not be assigned to any tier. Applying the modified ESCAT criteria resolved all previously unclassifiable biomarkers and increased Tier 1 assignments to 73%. Inter-rater reliability (Krippendorffs alpha) was moderate (0.586) and 62% of classifications required consensus discussions. Comparison with ESCAT tiers reported in ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines showed improved concordance when using the modified criteria. Conclusions. The native ESCAT criteria are highly stringent, resulting in many FDA-recognized, clinically validated biomarkers that are currently assigned level 1 by OncoKBTM not mapping to any existing tier. Our predefined modifications improved alignment with OncoKBTM Level 1 designations and with published ESMO clinical practice guidelines. The mapped set of standard care biomarkers are provided on the OncoKBTM website, offering a practical resource that harmonizes ESCAT tiers of evidence with a widely adopted levels of evidence schema.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
8
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
13
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
15
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
16
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
19
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
22
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%