Back

An Interpretable Multimodal Framework for Student Mental Health Risk Assessment Using Temporal Embeddings and Fuzzy Inference

Shah, A.; Mehta, A.; Bhensdadia, C. K.

2026-05-20 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.16.26352630 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mental health challenges among university students have increased due to academic pressure, lifestyle changes, and continuous digital engagement. Existing approaches for mental health assessment often rely either on self-reported psychological scales or isolated behavioral indicators, limiting their ability to capture complex temporal and contextual patterns. This study proposes an interpretable multimodal framework for student mental health risk assessment using behavioral sensing, academic information, ecological momentary assessments (EMA), and psychometric survey data. A bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory autoencoder is employed to learn latent temporal representations from day-level behavioral sequences, while graph embeddings capture structural relationships among students using similarity-based neighborhood graphs. These representations are fused with academic and survey-derived features and reduced using Principal Component Analysis and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection. K-means clustering is then applied to identify behaviorally distinct student groups. Experimental analysis on the StudentLife dataset demonstrates meaningful clustering performance with a Silhouette Score of 0.4209 and Adjusted Rand Index stability of 0.6869. The identified clusters correspond to low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk behavioral profiles. To improve interpretability and practical usability, a fuzzy inference system is introduced to compute mental risk, academic risk, and wellbeing indices using psychometric indicators including PHQ-9, PSS, PANAS, VR-12, and Big Five personality traits. The results demonstrate the potential of combining multimodal behavioral modeling with interpretable fuzzy reasoning to support early mental health risk assessment in educational settings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.3%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
3
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
6
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.3%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
10
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
11
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
13
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
22
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
23
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%