Back

Meditation Styles Are Highly Discriminable from EEG at the Subject Level With Limited Generalization Across the Population: A Machine-Learning Study

Hayat, S.; Goretti, F.; Fabbri, R.; Noferini, C.; Cravero, E.; Mori, P.; Scaglione, A.; Pavone, F. S.

2026-05-19 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.15.725404 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Meditation has been associated with improvements in attention, emotional regulation, and mental well-being, motivating increasing interest in objective methods for assessing meditative states. In this study, we investigate whether EEG-based machine learning can reliably distinguish between multiple meditation styles and mind-wandering states. EEG data were recorded from experienced meditators performing three meditation styles, Shamatha, Vipassana, and Metta, together with an eyes-closed mind-wandering condition. EEG signals were preprocessed to remove artifacts, and features were extracted from frequency, time-frequency, and time domains. Classification was evaluated using both intra-subject and inter-subject strategies with multiple machine learning classifiers. Results demonstrate high intra-subject classification accuracy across meditation-versus-mind-wandering and meditation-style comparisons, indicating strongly discriminative subject-specific neural signatures. In contrast, inter-subject performance decreased substantially, particularly for distinguishing meditation styles, suggesting considerable inter-individual variability in meditation-related EEG patterns. Furthermore, temporal analysis revealed that classification performance increase over time, indicating that the neural distinctions between meditation states become increasingly pronounced over time. Additionally, t-SNE visualization showed clear within-subject clustering but increased overlap across subjects, explaining the reduced inter-subject generalization. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of EEG-based machine learning for personalized assessment and monitoring of meditative states while emphasizing the challenges of developing subject-independent meditation classification systems.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.2%
2
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.4%
3
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
4
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
10
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
11
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
12
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
15
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
18
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.1%
21
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%