Back

Tumoral Switch in NUMB splicing changes essential transcription pathways and induces malignant properties in tumour cells

Garcia-Heredia, J. M.; Carnero, A.; Ortega-Campos, S.

2026-05-19 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.15.725391 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRecent evidence suggests that cancer can exhibit splicing alterations that give rise to tumour-specific isoforms. One example is NUMB, which produces four isoforms (p72, p71, p66, and p65) through alternative splicing of exons 3 and 9. Traditionally considered a tumour suppressor, it also has been considered an oncogene. We propose that this duality is due to isoform-specific expression. ResultsUsing public databases, we identified a tumour-associated switch in NUMB isoform expression: p72/p71 are upregulated in tumours, whereas p66/p65 are more expressed in non-tumour tissues. These isoforms correlate differently with cellular processes. NUMBL, a NUMB homolog, behaves similarly to p65. We identified two transcriptional clusters: one characterized by high expression of p72/p71, and another by p66/p65/NUMBL. Each group was associated differently with the Notch, WNT/{beta}-catenin, Hedgehog, and Hippo signalling pathways, suggesting isoform-specific regulatory roles. Analysis of breast cancer cell lines (CCLE) led to a NUMB score based on isoform expression, which classified cell lines into biologically distinct groups. The p72/p71-enriched group showed distinct signatures, pathway activity, and drug sensitivity. Applying this score to TCGA-BRCA samples revealed a significant link between high NUMB-score and poor survival, confirmed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. ConclusionsNUMB emerges as a potential oncogenic contributor and biomarker in splicing-based personalised medicine, highlighting isoform-specific expression as a clinically relevant determinant of tumour behaviour, pathway activity, and therapeutic response.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
4
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
5
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
7
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
14
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
18
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
20
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
NAR Cancer
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
28
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%