Back

Efficient Optimization of Genotype Pairs for Intercropping using Genomic Prediction and Bayesian Optimization

Kinoshita, S.; Iwata, H.

2026-05-18 genomics
10.64898/2026.05.15.725387 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intercropping is a promising strategy to improve productivity and sustainability in agricultural systems, but designing effective genotype combinations remains a major challenge owing to the rapid increase in possible pairings as the number of candidate genotypes increases. This creates a practical bottleneck because field evaluation of all combinations is infeasible under realistic resource constraints. Here, we propose a framework that integrates genomic prediction and Bayesian optimization to support efficient decision-making for intercropping system design. Using genome-wide marker data from sorghum and soybean, we simulated intercropping performance across 5,214 genotype pairs under certain genetic architectures, including variation in heritability, correlations between direct and indirect genetic effects, and the contribution of pair-specific interactions. Genomic prediction models incorporating direct and indirect genetic effects substantially improved prediction accuracy compared with models based on direct genetic effects alone, and inclusion of specific mixing ability further enhanced the performance under high-heritability conditions. When coupled with Bayesian optimization, the models rapidly identified superior genotype pairs, requiring fewer evaluation cycles than random or prediction-only search strategies. Acquisition functions that account for predicted uncertainty were most effective in complex scenarios involving interaction effects or negative correlations between direct and indirect effects. These results demonstrate that combining genomic prediction with Bayesian optimization can substantially reduce the experimental burden associated with intercropping design, while improving the efficiency of identifying high-performing genotype pairs. The proposed framework provides a practical approach for prioritizing candidate mixtures in breeding and field evaluation, and contributes to the development of data-driven strategies for sustainable agricultural systems. HighlightsO_LIA data-driven framework was developed to optimize genotype pairs in intercropping. C_LIO_LIModeling indirect effects improved prediction accuracy across genotype pairs. C_LIO_LIPair-specific interactions enhanced prediction under high-heritability conditions. C_LIO_LIBayesian optimization identified superior pairs under limited evaluation capacity. C_LIO_LIThe framework reduces field-testing requirements for intercropping system design. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.6%
2
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
5
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
6
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
8
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
9
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
13
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
16
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
18
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
20
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
24
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
25
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%