Back

Socio-geographic factors associated with Lyme disease in children

Wychgram, C.; Geanacopoulos, A. T.; Rebman, A. W.; Chapman, L. L.; Green, R. S.; Neville, D. N.; Thompson, A. D.; Ladell, M. M.; Kharbanda, A. B.; Mandl, K. D.; Curriero, F. C.; Aucott, J. N.; Nigrovic, L. E.; Pedi Lyme Net,

2026-05-20 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.15.26353361 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: Lyme disease diagnosis in children is challenging due to atypical presentations and testing limitations. We sought to evaluate the association between Lyme disease and socio-geographic risk factors in children. Materials and methods: We enrolled children undergoing evaluation for acute Lyme disease at one of eight Pedi Lyme Net pediatric emergency departments located in high Lyme disease incidence states over a ten-year period (2015-2024). We defined a case of Lyme disease with an erythema migrans (EM) lesion or a positive two-tier serology result in a child with signs and/or symptoms of acute disease. We linked each childs primary residential county to the following factors: urban-rural residence, socioeconomic status, population-level disease incidence, wildland-urban interface, and "Lyme disease" Google searches. We performed a multi-level logistic regression analysis to evaluate associations between Lyme disease and county factors after adjusting for individual demographics. Results: Among 5,529 children enrolled, 1,396 (25.2%) had Lyme disease: 101 (7.2%) with early-localized disease, 584 (41.8%) with early-disseminated disease, and 711 (50.9%) with late-disseminated disease. Rural residence (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.9), higher socioeconomic advantage (aOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.4), more "Lyme disease" Google searches (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2), and higher wildland urban interface (aOR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0-1.4) were independently associated with Lyme disease. Conclusion: Incorporating socio-geographic factors alongside clinical data may augment diagnostic risk assessment in children with suspected Lyme disease. However, these factors should be incorporated carefully to ensure clinical assessments are not based on a childs geographic location alone.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
31.5%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.6%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.6%
4
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
5
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
7
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
Pediatrics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
Vaccine
203 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
12
BMJ Paediatrics Open
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Eurosurveillance
83 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
19
Public Health
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Tropical Medicine & International Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Health Science Reports
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
25
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%