Back

High Norovirus False Discovery Rates and Noro-1 Assay Cross-Reactivity in the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel

Mauer, C.; Reed, J. C.; Mack, A. R.; Theriault, E. A.; Tansarli, G. S.; Fang, F. C.; Bourassa, L.; Greninger, A. L.

2026-05-20 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.05.15.26353342 medRxiv
Show abstract

Molecular syndromic panels such as the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel (BF-GIP) have been widely adopted for gastrointestinal illness diagnosis due to their fast turnaround times and broad pathogen coverage. Recently, the BF-GIP demonstrated increased rates of norovirus false-positive detections, prompting a Class II recall of more than two million tests in February 2024. We examined the prevalence of BF-GIP norovirus false positives across four hospitals from December 2024 to June 2025. Among 185 BF-GIP norovirus-positive results confirmed with the BD MAX Enteric Viral Panel, the false discovery rate ranged from 31 to 74% across sites, with the highest rate seen at a specialized cancer care hospital. Deep sequencing of BF-GIP pouches (n=42) confirmed the Noro-1 assay as the primary source of off-target amplification, identifying 78 off-target species, predominantly commensal stool bacteria, compared to only two species for the Noro-2 assay. Off-target species amplified by the Noro-1 assay were recovered from both false-positive and true-negative pouches, suggesting no single species accounted for the false-positive results. Partial primer complementarity at off-target loci and amplicon Tm values within the acceptable range support mispriming of gut microbiota as the underlying cause. False-positive pouches exhibited significantly higher Cp values than true positives for both assays (Noro-1: 26.6 vs. 11.1, p=0.013; Noro-2: 30.0 vs. 13.1, p<0.001), consistent with low-level off-target amplification. These findings highlight the high false discovery rate of the Noro-1 assay, identify bacterial species involved in mispriming, and demonstrate the need to redesign this assay to ensure reliable testing and improved patient care.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.