Back

Development and validation of a digital pathology artificial intelligence (DPAI)-based biomarker predicting risk of Gleason grade group reclassification for patients who are candidates for active surveillance

Mabey, B.; Lenz, L. H.; Schiewer, M. J.; Rayford, W.; Muhammad, H.; Huang, W.; Finch, R.; Nakamoto, C.; Kouros-Mehr, H.; Jasper, J.; Basu, H.; Feng, C.; Sharma, A.; Wilding, G.; Roy, R.; Muzzey, D.; Gutin, A.

2026-05-20 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.15.26353328 medRxiv
Show abstract

Aims Active surveillance (AS) allows selected men with localized prostate cancer to defer curative therapy and reduce treatment morbidity. Conversion from AS to treatment is commonly triggered by Gleason grade group (GGG) upgrading on confirmatory biopsy. We developed and validated a digital pathology artificial intelligence (DPAI) biomarker to predict GGG upgrading in AS-eligible patients. Materials & Methods The DPAI model was trained using histopathology image features from diagnostic biopsies of 998 patients and validated in an independent cohort of 296 patients meeting criteria for AS. Logistic regression estimated the probability of confirmatory-biopsy GGG increase, and feature selection identified the most predictive variables. Results AI-GUR (Artificial Intelligence-Gleason Upgrade Risk) predicted GGG reclassification at confirmatory biopsy (OR 1.60; p=0.0003), and provided information beyond conventional stratification (risk group, CAPRA) and cribriform morphology (all p<0.01). Predicted risks were similar across time from diagnosis (~10-15% to ~85% at 1, 1.5, or 2 years; p for time=0.50), consistent with initial biopsy mischaracterization rather than time-dependent progression. Conclusions AI-GUR provides individualized estimates of confirmatory-biopsy GGG upgrading for AS candidates. Using DPAI may improve shared decision-making by complementing standard clinicopathologic tools and molecular testing using the same biopsy specimen, while informing the likelihood of grade upgrade at confirmation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
4
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
The Prostate
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.3%
9
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
19
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
28
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
Journal of Extracellular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
30
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%