Back

Temporal Relationships between Smartphone Application Use and Online Substance Procurement in U.S. Youth

Gansner, M.; Adams, M.; Nikam, P.; Huntley, N.; Ramrajesh, S.; Marsch, L. A.; Levy, S.; Schuman-Olivier, Z.

2026-05-19 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.05.15.26353324 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Despite the significant risks associated with online substance procurement (SP), few researchers have examined this practice in U.S. youth. The studies that do exist are cross-sectional and cannot temporally connect specific digital behaviors to online SP. This longitudinal cohort study examined youth SP and digital media habits to determine whether use of certain smartphone applications correlated with increased odds of online SP or being contacted online about procuring drugs or alcohol. Methods: A cohort of U.S. youth (aged 15-20) with a history of non-daily substance use in the 3 months prior to enrollment was recruited to use the digital phenotyping smartphone application EARS for 90 days. On a nightly basis, participants were asked to complete surveys about online experiences related to SP and instances of substance use. Smartphone-generated screen use data were also collected passively each day. Results: Out of 112 enrolled participants, 106 were able to be included in analyses. Over approximately 3 months, 28.3% of participants (n=30) reported a collective 91 instances where they used social media to acquire drugs or alcohol. Screen use data demonstrated temporal relationships between social media SP and applications previously connected to the social media drug-purchasing process (e.g., TikTok, encrypted apps), as well as other school-specific social media. Discussion: Our results provide critically needed research evidence to support a body of literature composed predominantly of anecdotal reports. Despite measures taken by social media companies to prevent use of their platforms for drug procurement, underage youth continue to engage in this practice.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.3%
2
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.0%
3
Preventive Medicine Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.3%
5
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.5%
6
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
8
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.3%
10
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
11
Addiction
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.4%
16
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
18
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
BMJ Paediatrics Open
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
International Journal of Drug Policy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
26
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Journal of Psychiatric Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
29
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
30
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%