Back

A genome-wide association study of problematic sexual behaviour: genetic overlap with psychiatric, behavioural and personality phenotypes

Foo, J. C.; Jiang, S.; Ilnytskyy, Y.; Li, D.; Hu, X.; Arnau, R.; Isenberg, R.; Green, B.; Kovalchuk, I.; Frank, J.; Lodhi, R.; Behavioral Addictions Studies and Insights Consortium, ; Streit, F.; Carnes, P. J.; Aitchison, K. J.

2026-05-20 addiction medicine
10.64898/2026.05.15.26351052 medRxiv
Show abstract

Problematic Sexual Behaviour (PSB) is defined as difficult to control recurrent sexual behaviours that continue despite adverse consequences, leading to social and functional impairment. There is debate whether PSB is a disorder of compulsion or addiction; PSB often co-occurs with neuropsychiatric disorders, but further elucidation regarding underlying biology is required. A deficiency in reward neurotransmitter systems (reward deficiency syndrome: RDS) may underlie a shared vulnerability to addiction. We conducted the first case-control genome wide association study (GWAS) of PSB in patients (n=448), and comparison participants with (n=196) and without PSB (n=1488). We used polygenic risk scores (PRS) to test genetic overlap with related psychiatric, behavioural and personality phenotypes. Three models were used: 1) All-PSB (patient + comparison) vs. controls, 2) Patient-PSB vs controls, and 3) RDS (yes/no). Results suggested genetic overlap of PSB with psychiatric conditions, with PRS for major depression, substance use, and others predicting PSB status. PRS for related behavioural phenotypes (e.g., externalizing, age at first sex, number of lifetime sexual partners) and personality traits also predicted PSB. The patient model showed stronger associations than the All-PSB model, and RDS had both shared and distinct genetics with PSB. As expected with the sample size, only suggestive hits were observed with single variant and gene-based tests. PSB may share genetic mechanisms with various conditions. Further research in larger cohorts is needed to better understand the underlying genetics and environmental factors involved, and to improve diagnostic classification, intervention and treatment prospects.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.