Back

TreeGazer: Prospecting Protein Sequence-Function Landscapes via Phylogenetic Structure

Porras, S. A.; Davis, S. J.; Paredes Trujillo, O. D.; Diep, P.; Schenk, G.; Boden, M.

2026-05-17 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.14.725301 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Building diverse and informative protein sequence datasets is critical for understanding how function varies across sequence space. Because only a small fraction of sequences in a dataset can typically be experimentally characterised, strategies for selecting what sequences to characterise should maximise the information gained from each experiment. Here, we present TreeGazer, a phylogeny-informed framework that combines Bayesian optimisation with the topology of a tree to guide sequence selection. TreeGazer balances exploitation of sequences predicted to exhibit favourable properties against exploration of regions higher model uncertainty. Unlike existing approaches that apply Bayesian optimisation for sequence selection, TreeGazer does not rely on black-box models and instead uses latent representations of property distributions that are directly tied to phylogenetic structure. Modelling properties in this way enables biologically interpretable predictions and uncertainty estimates. Across two simulated selection campaigns, TreeGazer consistently selected sequences that produced datasets more representative of the underlying property distribution than alternative strategies that used protein language models. TreeGazer also performed effectively in low-data settings, where tree-guided selection enabled accurate identification of functional transitions across clades. TreeGazer can be run on conventional laptop computers while still providing equivalent or superior performance to embedding-based approaches. These results demonstrate that phylogenetic structure is a powerful and underutilised prior for guiding informative sequence selection.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 2%
17.4%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
10.4%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.0%
4
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.3%
8
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.9%
10
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
11
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
12
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
17
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
20
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
21
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%