Back

Resolving the oak tree of life: comparing RADseq and whole genome resequencing methods for oak phylogenetics

Hipp, A. L.; Althaus, K. N.; Fuller, E. L.; Hahn, M.; Larson, D. A.; Mohn, R. A.; Wang, B.; Manos, P. S.

2026-05-17 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.14.725274 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Forest trees pose numerous potential challenges to phylogenomic inference. Their large effective population sizes and relatively long generation times lead to deep allele coalescence and consequently incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), which biases inferences of divergence times toward older ages and introduces gene tree discordance. Deep phylogenetic divergences, reaching back into the Paleocene, introduce reference-mapping biases. Introgression--the movement of genes between lineages--may result in different phylogenies being inferred depending on which individuals are included in analysis, even if the plurality of the genome favors the divergence history unaffected by introgression. These factors influence phylogenetic inference across the Tree of Life but are particularly prevalent in forest trees. Oaks (Quercus) are notable for all three influences. In addition, our knowledge of the oak phylogeny is currently based strongly on restriction site associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) datasets published over the past decade, which may introduce additional sources of uncertainty. In this chapter, we analyze a 322-species RADseq dataset and genome resequencing data from across the genus to address sources of uncertainty in our understanding of the global oak phylogeny, which we hope will serve as a model for other research groups working on comparable woody plant groups.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.5%
3
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.0%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
11
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
15
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
18
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
19
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%
29
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%