Back

Multisite Evaluation of an Amplification-based Nanopore Sequencing Solution to Analyze Challenging Clinically Relevant Variants in Genes Associated with Hereditary Diseases

Filipovic-Sadic, S.; Parker, C. A.; Mihailovic, M. K.; Milligan, J. N.; Turner, J. M.; Borel, S. L.; Le, V.; Markulin, T.; Janovsky, J. W.; Killinger, B. J.; Deshotel, M. J.; Reading, N. S.; Fredrickson, E. K.; Ji, Y.; Close, D.; Wright, J.; Williams, M.; Barrie, E. S.; Martin, K. E.; Gray, S. M.; Haynes, B. C.; Hall, B.

2026-05-19 genetics
10.64898/2026.05.14.725224 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeCarrier screening for hereditary conditions is challenged by genes with complex genomic architecture, where short-read sequencing can fail to detect clinically relevant variants. This study evaluated a unified, amplification-based nanopore sequencing workflow across multiple laboratories for comprehensive analysis of such loci. MethodsA modular long-read sequencing assay was evaluated across five laboratories using targeted PCR enrichment, Oxford Nanopore sequencing, and automated variant analysis. The workflow interrogated genes associated with spinal muscular atrophy, thalassemia, cystic fibrosis, fragile X syndrome, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, Gaucher disease, and hemophilia A. Performance was assessed against orthogonal methods for single nucleotide variants (SNVs), indels, copy-number variants, repeat expansions, and structural rearrangements. ResultsAcross 882 unique samples (1,266 tests), overall agreement with comparator methods exceeded 96% for variant-level detection and 97% for genotype status classification. Long-read sequencing enabled phasing of paralogous loci, integrated sizing and interruption analysis for FMR1 repeats, and simultaneous detection of SNVs and structural variants in globin loci and CYP21A2-TNXB region, reducing reliance on multiple workflows. ConclusionThis multisite evaluation suggests that targeted long-read sequencing can consolidate complex variant detection into a single workflow, improving analytical completeness and operational efficiency for carrier screening.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
4
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
6
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
7
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.9%
9
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
10
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
14
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
16
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Forensic Science International: Genetics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
22
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
26
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
27
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%