Back

Occupational hierarchy, racialization, and COVID-19 health outcomes among meat processing plant workers in Alberta: a community-engaged mixed-methods study

Essar, M. Y.; Norrie, E.; Cerino, E. R.; Antonio, M.; Saad, A.; Yemane, M.; Holdbrook, L.; Sahilie, A.; Youssef, M.; Hassan, N.; Magwood, O.; Edwards, S. T.; Spitzer, D.; Coakley, A.; Pottie, K.; Fabreau, G. E.

2026-05-20 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353257 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Meat processing plants in Alberta, Canada experienced among North America's largest COVID-19 outbreaks. We examined health impacts among workers by occupational hierarchy and equity-relevant characteristics. Methods This exploratory sequential mixed-methods study was guided by community-based participatory research and the PROGRESS-Plus framework. Multilingual qualitative interviews and surveys using validated instruments were conducted among meat plant workers who experienced outbreaks. Interviews were analysed using inductive-deductive thematic analysis. Multivariable logistic regression and linear regression estimated associations between occupational group, racialization, facility, and self-reported COVID-19 diagnosis, physical and mental health, and mean Everyday Discrimination Scale score. We integrated findings using joint displays. Findings Qualitative and integrated analysis of thirty-six interviews described occupational hierarchy shaping unequal protection, limited communication, constrained agency, and psychosocial harms, amplified by income insecurity and family separation. Among 187 survey respondents, compared with general labour, skilled labour (aOR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.89) and management (aOR 0.13; 95% CI 0.01-0.75) had lower odds of reported COVID-19 diagnosis. Compared with Black workers, other racialized workers had lower odds of reporting fair or poor mental (aOR 0.24; 95% CI 0.09-0.58) and physical health (aOR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.54). Compared with workers from the primary facility, others reported lower mean everyday discrimination scores ({beta} = -0.54; 95% CI -0.96 to -0.12). Interpretation COVID-19 harms followed workplace social hierarchies. Pandemic preparedness should combine infection-control measures with paid sick leave and income protection, multilingual communication, enforceable anti-discrimination standards, and independent reporting mechanisms. Funding Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR Application no. 469206). Keywords COVID-19, immigrant workers, migrants, essential workers, health equity, occupational health, PROGRESS Plus

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.2%
3
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
5
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
7
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
12
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
23
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
30
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%