How the COVID-19 pandemic and cost-of-living crisis shaped reach and engagement in the ECAIL trial targeting socially disadvantaged families: an interdisciplinary implementation study
Poquet, D.; Le Gal, C.; Hincker, P.; Beghin, L.; Deplanque, D.; Subtil, D.; Sion, O.; Cavalli, B.; VANHOUTTE, L.; Jacobsen, V.; Marr, K.; Sakellaris, I.; de Lauzon Guillain, B.; Charles, M.-A.; Ley, D.; Sauvegrain, P.; Lioret, S.
Show abstract
Background: The ECAIL trial, launched in 2017, targets hard-to-reach families and evaluates a multicomponent childhood obesity prevention intervention. At a maternity hospital in Lille, France, healthcare providers screened pregnant women experiencing social vulnerability, and dietitians delivered a home-based intervention until age 2. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a six-month suspension in 2020. This study compared eligibility and participation before the pandemic and after resumption, and examined how the pandemic and subsequent cost-of-living crisis shaped implementation and reach. Methods: We analyzed 5,744 eligibility questionnaires distributed at the maternity ward. Inclusion criteria included [≥]1 indicator of social vulnerability (e.g., socioeconomic disadvantage, precarious housing, or social isolation). To capture implementation experiences, a psychosocial researcher conducted a focus group with six dietitians delivering the intervention; it was recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically focusing on reach, acceptability, and adaptation. Results: Eligibility increased from 29.7% (n=955) prepandemic to 33.6% (n=849) after resumption, while the distribution of vulnerability criteriaremainedsimilar across periods:78.3% received social/medical benefits; employment was not the main source of household income for 58.7%; 24.4% experienced financial hardship; 14.7% reported social isolation; 6.0% lived in precarious housing; and 19.0% had three or more vulnerabilities. Participation among eligible women remained stable (24.6%; n=443). Qualitative findings indicated dietitians satisfaction and participants enthusiasm for the resumption of home visits, particularly in addressing social isolation. After resumption, the introduction of a pre-visit COVID-19 questionnaire reduced missed appointments. Converging qualitative and quantitative findings indicated sustained, and in some cases strengthened, provider engagement despite pandemic-related strain on hospital services. Conclusions: This study shows that a complex intervention can maintain reach and acceptability through adaptive implementation under major contextual disruptions.The rapid resumption of home-based services emerged as a robust strategy for engaging and retaining socially disadvantaged families, highlighting the importance of flexible, context-sensitive approaches during social and economic crises.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A community-based mentoring scheme for pregnant and parenting adolescents in Sierra Leone: protocol for a hybrid pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 95%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
- Improving Maternal Outcomes of Young Mothers through mHealth and Community-Based Interventions: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Trial in Kwale County, Coastal Kenya 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is the Healthy Start scheme associated with increased food expenditure in low-income families with young children in the United Kingdom? 94%
- How is the COVID-19 pandemic impacting our life, mental health, and well-being? Design and preliminary findings of the pan-Canadian longitudinal COHESION Study 94%
- A mixed methods study evaluating food insecurity and diet quality in households accessing food aid in England 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the impact of Covid-19 on Nurturing Care in Nairobi Slums: Findings from 5 rounds of cross-sectional telephone surveys 94%
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 94%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating implementation of LEAPS, a youth-led early childhood care and education intervention in rural Pakistan: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial 93%
- ReachUHC: A randomized controlled trial study protocol of a mobile phone-based reminder and automatic renewal intervention to increase health insurance renewal rates in Kumasi, Ghana 92%
- Azithromycin mass drug administration to reduce child mortality in Niger (AVENIR II): a master protocol for a cluster-randomized adaptive platform trial to evaluate community-based health interventions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 95%
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 94%
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.