Back

How the COVID-19 pandemic and cost-of-living crisis shaped reach and engagement in the ECAIL trial targeting socially disadvantaged families: an interdisciplinary implementation study

Poquet, D.; Le Gal, C.; Hincker, P.; Beghin, L.; Deplanque, D.; Subtil, D.; Sion, O.; Cavalli, B.; VANHOUTTE, L.; Jacobsen, V.; Marr, K.; Sakellaris, I.; de Lauzon Guillain, B.; Charles, M.-A.; Ley, D.; Sauvegrain, P.; Lioret, S.

2026-05-19 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353230 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The ECAIL trial, launched in 2017, targets hard-to-reach families and evaluates a multicomponent childhood obesity prevention intervention. At a maternity hospital in Lille, France, healthcare providers screened pregnant women experiencing social vulnerability, and dietitians delivered a home-based intervention until age 2. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a six-month suspension in 2020. This study compared eligibility and participation before the pandemic and after resumption, and examined how the pandemic and subsequent cost-of-living crisis shaped implementation and reach. Methods: We analyzed 5,744 eligibility questionnaires distributed at the maternity ward. Inclusion criteria included [≥]1 indicator of social vulnerability (e.g., socioeconomic disadvantage, precarious housing, or social isolation). To capture implementation experiences, a psychosocial researcher conducted a focus group with six dietitians delivering the intervention; it was recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically focusing on reach, acceptability, and adaptation. Results: Eligibility increased from 29.7% (n=955) prepandemic to 33.6% (n=849) after resumption, while the distribution of vulnerability criteriaremainedsimilar across periods:78.3% received social/medical benefits; employment was not the main source of household income for 58.7%; 24.4% experienced financial hardship; 14.7% reported social isolation; 6.0% lived in precarious housing; and 19.0% had three or more vulnerabilities. Participation among eligible women remained stable (24.6%; n=443). Qualitative findings indicated dietitians satisfaction and participants enthusiasm for the resumption of home visits, particularly in addressing social isolation. After resumption, the introduction of a pre-visit COVID-19 questionnaire reduced missed appointments. Converging qualitative and quantitative findings indicated sustained, and in some cases strengthened, provider engagement despite pandemic-related strain on hospital services. Conclusions: This study shows that a complex intervention can maintain reach and acceptability through adaptive implementation under major contextual disruptions.The rapid resumption of home-based services emerged as a robust strategy for engaging and retaining socially disadvantaged families, highlighting the importance of flexible, context-sensitive approaches during social and economic crises.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.1%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
5
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
6
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
7
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
11
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
12
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
28
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
30
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%