Development and Psychometric Testing of the Maternity Empowerment (MPower) instrument
Buchanan, K.; KAUMANNS, A.; THALIB, L.; Leahy-Warren, P.; NIEUWENHUIJZE, M.
Show abstract
Introduction Perinatal Empowerment is widely referenced in maternity care research, yet its use often lacks clear conceptual definitions and validated measures. Existing instruments do not capture the multidimensional nature of perinatal empowerment, including both external dimensions (e.g., gender equity, resource access), and internal dimensions (e.g., confidence, agency and informed decision making). This gap has limited the ability to rigorously evaluate how healthcare experiences shape empowerment during pregnancy, birth, and the postpartum period. Aim To develop a valid and reliable instrument that measures dimensions of perinatal empowerment, both external and internal. Methods Instrument development followed the seven-step MEASURE framework. Initial item generation was guided by a concept analysis, a scoping review of existing instruments, and feedback from international midwifery experts. A preliminary 51-item instrument underwent expert content validity review, resulting in 48 items, which were then pilot-tested with six pregnant and postnatal women. A large-scale validation study was conducted via an international online survey (N=155). Psychometric testing included exploratory factor analysis (EFA), reliability assessment using Cronbachs , known-groups validity testing, and regression analyses adjusting for potential confounders. Results EFA supported two overarching dimensions--external and internal empowerment--with six factors across 30 final items (18 external, 12 internal). Sampling adequacy was high, and item loadings exceeded recommended thresholds. Internal consistency was strong for both dimensions (=0.88 external; =0.87 internal). Women receiving midwifery continuity of care reported significantly higher empowerment scores across total, external, and internal dimensions compared with other care models (p<.001). Differences between primiparous and multiparous women were not statistically significant. Conclusion The MPower instrument represents a conceptually grounded, psychometrically robust measure of multidimensional perinatal empowerment in high-income settings. Further validation in more diverse populations is needed to refine the instrument and expand its applicability across clinical and research contexts.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing and validating the Nepalese Abuse Assessment Screen (N-AAS) for identifying domestic violence among pregnant women in Nepal 96%
- Cultural adaptation of the person-centered maternity care scale at governmental health facilities in Cambodia 96%
- Exploring midwives understanding of respectful and non-abusive maternal care in Kumasi, Ghana: Qualitative Inquiry 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 96%
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 95%
- Factors influencing the motivation of maternal health workers in conflict setting of Mogadishu, Somalia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Menstrual Practice Needs Scale Short Form (MPNS-SF) and Rapid (MPNS-R): Development in Khulna, Bangladesh, and validation in cross-sectional surveys from Bangladesh and Uganda 95%
- Development and validation protocol for an instrument to measure women’s empowerment in urban sanitation across countries: The Agency, Resources, and Institutional Structures for Sanitation-related Empowerment (ARISE) Scales 94%
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 95%
- Maternal Postpartum Stress Scale: Translation and validation study of the Chinese version 95%
- A Cross-Sectional Survey Of Australian Women'S Perspectives And Experiences Of Exercise During Pregnancy, Including Women That Experience Mental Illness 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 94%
- Mothers’ experiences of using Facebook groups for local breastfeeding support: results of an online survey exploring midwife moderation 94%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.