Back

Cognitive Flexibility and Decision-Making in Anxiety and Depression: Meta-Analytic Evidence Facilitated by Machine-Learning Screening

Balcazar, J.; Albanese, B.; Rymer, T.; Davis, M.; Campos, S.; Polimerou, M.; Abel, E.; Shapley, J.; Algranatti, I.; Wood, H.; Smith, H.; Hankamer, K.; Orr, J.

2026-05-18 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353209 medRxiv
Show abstract

The ability to adjust to changing environments (cognitive flexibility) and optimal decision-making are pivotal brain functions that govern successful human behavior. Anxiety and depressive disorders are strongly pervasive psychiatric conditions across the lifespan that profoundly disrupt mechanisms of attention, working memory, and decision-making. Although existing task evidence documents impaired decision-making and flexibility outcomes for both anxiety and depression, there is a growing need to systematically evaluate the role of anxiety and depression and to quantitatively compare the effects of these disorders on these domains. In the present study, we conducted a meta-analysis of anxiety and depression on decision-making and cognitive flexibility. We utilized a random-effects approach, given that a large amount of between-subject heterogeneity was anticipated. Given the scope of this meta-analysis, we used the machine learning tool asReview to more efficiently conduct a meta-analytic search. Across all outcomes, results showed anxiety and depression were associated with reduced cognitive flexibility and decision-making. These effect sizes were then tested for significance using a fixed-effects (plural) model. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between anxiety and depression for either decision-making or flexibility outcomes, consistent with a transdiagnostic perspective. Results are contextualized in light of the biopsychosocial model and potential transdiagnostic factors.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.