Cognitive Flexibility and Decision-Making in Anxiety and Depression: Meta-Analytic Evidence Facilitated by Machine-Learning Screening
Balcazar, J.; Albanese, B.; Rymer, T.; Davis, M.; Campos, S.; Polimerou, M.; Abel, E.; Shapley, J.; Algranatti, I.; Wood, H.; Smith, H.; Hankamer, K.; Orr, J.
Show abstract
The ability to adjust to changing environments (cognitive flexibility) and optimal decision-making are pivotal brain functions that govern successful human behavior. Anxiety and depressive disorders are strongly pervasive psychiatric conditions across the lifespan that profoundly disrupt mechanisms of attention, working memory, and decision-making. Although existing task evidence documents impaired decision-making and flexibility outcomes for both anxiety and depression, there is a growing need to systematically evaluate the role of anxiety and depression and to quantitatively compare the effects of these disorders on these domains. In the present study, we conducted a meta-analysis of anxiety and depression on decision-making and cognitive flexibility. We utilized a random-effects approach, given that a large amount of between-subject heterogeneity was anticipated. Given the scope of this meta-analysis, we used the machine learning tool asReview to more efficiently conduct a meta-analytic search. Across all outcomes, results showed anxiety and depression were associated with reduced cognitive flexibility and decision-making. These effect sizes were then tested for significance using a fixed-effects (plural) model. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between anxiety and depression for either decision-making or flexibility outcomes, consistent with a transdiagnostic perspective. Results are contextualized in light of the biopsychosocial model and potential transdiagnostic factors.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Common and separable neural alterations in adult and adolescent depression – evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses 94%
- Psychological Distress and Metabolomic Markers: A Systematic Review 93%
- Common And Distinct Patterns Of Task-Related Neural Activation Abnormalities In Patients With Remitted And Current Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review And Coordinate-Based Meta-Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Which traits predict elevated distress during the Covid-19 pandemic? Results from a large, longitudinal cohort study with psychiatric patients and healthy controls 94%
- Impaired Social Learning Predicts Reduced Real-life Motivation in Individuals with Depression: A Computational fMRI Study 94%
- What is the relation between major depressive disorder and amygdala reactivity? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote virtual reality assessment elucidates self-blame-related action tendencies in depression 94%
- Clinical properties of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire: Development of a free calculator based on a Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study 93%
- Elevated levels of hoarding in ADHD: a special link with inattention 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational Mechanisms of Approach-Avoidance Conflict Predictively Differentiate Between Affective and Substance Use Disorders 95%
- Computational modelling reveals slower safety learning and threat extinction are associated with higher anxiety severity in remote fear conditioning 93%
- Risk and loss aversion and attitude to COVID and vaccines in anxious individuals 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.