Back

Wastewater Surveillance as an Event Detection System: Outbreak and Peak Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Across 281 U.S. Counties

Link, N. B.; Garrido, R.; Nande, A.; Santillana, M.

2026-05-19 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353186 medRxiv
Show abstract

Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) is increasingly used to monitor infectious disease dynamics, yet most evaluations focus on correlation or forecasting - neither of which directly assesses whether wastewater signals can identify the epidemiological events most relevant to public health decision-making. We argue that outbreak onset and epidemic peak detection are the operationally critical use cases of WBS, requiring a fundamentally different evaluation framework. We introduce a classification-based framework that treats WBS as an event-detection problem, defining outbreaks and peaks as discrete events, establishing detection intervals to account for timing uncertainty, and incorporating censoring and data completeness criteria for valid comparisons against imperfect clinical reference outcomes. Within this framework, we apply a Bayesian exponential growth model for outbreak detection - benchmarked against a standard reproductive number (Rt)-based method - and a rule-based algorithm for peak detection, evaluating performance via sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Applied to county-level SARS-CoV-2 wastewater data from 281 U.S. counties (Biobot, 2021-2024), the exponential growth approach substantially outperforms the Rt-based baseline: sensitivity 0.82 and PPV 0.64 versus sensitivity 0.58 and PPV 0.19 for the best-performing Rt variant. Peak detection achieves sensitivity 0.84 and PPV 0.70 at the county level. Both peak and outbreak detection achieve strong and consistent performance against hospitalizations and deaths at the state level. Spatial aggregation yields a statistically significant improvement in peak detection PPV against a curated reference standard ($p < 0.001$), while outbreak detection improvements under aggregation are directionally consistent but not statistically significant. Wastewater leads case-defined outbreaks by 4-6 days but minimally leads epidemic peaks, consistent with wastewater approximating prevalence rather than incidence. These findings demonstrate that wastewater signals can reliably detect outbreak onset and epidemic peaks across spatial scales and clinical outcomes, and that the choice of detection method matters substantially in practice. The classification framework developed here provides a reusable and principled tool for evaluating any surveillance signal as an event-detection system, with direct relevance to how WBS is actually used in public health decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.9%
2
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
4
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.2%
7
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
8
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
10
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
14
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
22
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
23
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
26
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%