Back

Wastewater Surveillance as an Event Detection System: Outbreak and Peak Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Across 281 U.S. Counties

Link, N. B.; Garrido, R.; Nande, A.; Santillana, M.

2026-05-19 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353186 medRxiv
Show abstract

Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) is increasingly used to monitor infectious disease dynamics, yet most evaluations focus on correlation or forecasting - neither of which directly assesses whether wastewater signals can identify the epidemiological events most relevant to public health decision-making. We argue that outbreak onset and epidemic peak detection are the operationally critical use cases of WBS, requiring a fundamentally different evaluation framework. We introduce a classification-based framework that treats WBS as an event-detection problem, defining outbreaks and peaks as discrete events, establishing detection intervals to account for timing uncertainty, and incorporating censoring and data completeness criteria for valid comparisons against imperfect clinical reference outcomes. Within this framework, we apply a Bayesian exponential growth model for outbreak detection - benchmarked against a standard reproductive number (Rt)-based method - and a rule-based algorithm for peak detection, evaluating performance via sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Applied to county-level SARS-CoV-2 wastewater data from 281 U.S. counties (Biobot, 2021-2024), the exponential growth approach substantially outperforms the Rt-based baseline: sensitivity 0.82 and PPV 0.64 versus sensitivity 0.58 and PPV 0.19 for the best-performing Rt variant. Peak detection achieves sensitivity 0.84 and PPV 0.70 at the county level. Both peak and outbreak detection achieve strong and consistent performance against hospitalizations and deaths at the state level. Spatial aggregation yields a statistically significant improvement in peak detection PPV against a curated reference standard ($p < 0.001$), while outbreak detection improvements under aggregation are directionally consistent but not statistically significant. Wastewater leads case-defined outbreaks by 4-6 days but minimally leads epidemic peaks, consistent with wastewater approximating prevalence rather than incidence. These findings demonstrate that wastewater signals can reliably detect outbreak onset and epidemic peaks across spatial scales and clinical outcomes, and that the choice of detection method matters substantially in practice. The classification framework developed here provides a reusable and principled tool for evaluating any surveillance signal as an event-detection system, with direct relevance to how WBS is actually used in public health decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
PLOS Water
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
4
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
6
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
9
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
13
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
17
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
18
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
ACS ES&T Water
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
The Lancet Microbe
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
23
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%