Optimized hypertension care for people with high blood pressure by improved integrated care and self-management tools: a mixed-methods study
van Grondelle, S. E.; van Ede, A. F. T. M.; ter Braake, J. G.; van Bruggen, S.; Rutten, G. E. H. M.; Bots, M.; Vos, H. M. M.; Numans, M. E.; Vos, R. C.
Show abstract
Background: High blood pressure (BP) is an often treatable cause of cardiovascular disease. We developed an intervention, featuring a cardiovascular expert team and a toolbox, to support healthcare professionals (HCPs) in hypertension management and enhance patient self-management. Aim: This study evaluates the adoption and feasibility of this intervention. Design and Setting: A mixed-methods study in general practices in the Netherlands. Methods: HCPs could consult a cardiovascular expert team and use a self-management toolbox for their patients as preferred. We interviewed HCPs guided by the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR), and HCPs completed the Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire (DIBQ). Using CFIR-ERIC matching tool, we matched implementation strategies to identified barriers. Adults with elevated BP, who were prescribed at least two blood pressure lowering medications were eligible to participate. Patient and disease characteristics were extracted from the electronical medical record. Results: Of 591 eligible patients at thirteen general practices, 176 participated. The cardiovascular expert team was well-received, with 33 unique consultations, although nurse practitioners (NPs) might need the expertise of the expert team more frequently than general practitioners (GP) (adoption). The toolbox was perceived as challenging to use (feasibility). We subsequently identified three key strategies to improve implementation. Mean systolic and diastolic BP were 158/87 mmHg at baseline and 148/85 mmHg after 12 months, although this change cannot be conclusively linked to the intervention. Conclusions: Structured implementation strategies may be helpful in hypertension management. The cardiovascular expert team was considered valuable, but might be better targeted to NPs rather than GPs.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 93%
- Are Dutch General Practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?: a mixed-methods study 92%
- Trends and variation in prescribing of suboptimal statin treatment regimes: a cohort study in English primary care 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Empowering Healthcare Professionals in West Africa □ A Feasibility Study and Qualitative Assessment of a Dietary Screening Tool to Identify Adults at High Risk of Hypertension 94%
- Attrition and associated factors among patients on chronic antihypertensive therapy at Mulago hospital, Uganda: A mixed method study 94%
- Assessing the impact of community-based interventions on hypertension and diabetes management in three Minnesota communities: findings from the prospective evaluation of US HealthRise programs 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study 93%
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 92%
- Telehealth versus Self-Directed Lifestyle Intervention to Promote Healthy Blood Pressure: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Development of the Cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention 95%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): A feasibility report of a pilot cluster randomised trial of prescribing policy in primary care to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension 95%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 92%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 92%
- Home monitoring of HbA1c in diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and narrative synthesis on reliability, accuracy, and patient acceptability 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.