Back

Deep Learning for Cross-Domain Spatial Transcriptomic Modeling of Tissue Repair

Pham, T. D.

2026-05-15 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.13.724803 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial transcriptomics enables investigation of tissue organization while preserving molecular and spatial information within intact tissues. However, existing computational methods primarily focus on clustering and batch integration and provide limited characterization of higher-order spatial organization and transferable tissuestate dynamics across heterogeneous biological systems. This study introduces a cross-domain spatial transcriptomic framework centered on recurrence-based latent tissuestate analysis, pathological fragmentation quantification, and transferable representation learning between wound repair and tumor-associated microenvironments. Human spatial transcriptomic datasets spanning cutaneous wound healing, oral squamous cell carcinoma, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were integrated within a graph-based latent embedding framework. Recurrence analysis was applied within latent transcriptomic space to characterize spatial organization and remodeling dynamics. A pathological fragmentation index quantified intra-tissue spatial disorganization from recurrence structure. The learned latent embeddings achieved a mean silhouette score of 0.79, demonstrating coherent separation of tissue states. Recurrence analysis revealed progressive restoration of spatial organization during wound remodeling, whereas tumor-associated tissues exhibited increased fragmentation and heterogeneous recurrence structure. Independent single-cell RNA-seq reference atlases demonstrated reproducible multicellular enrichment patterns within latent spatial niches. The proposed framework demonstrates that recurrence-inspired latent spatial analysis may provide biologically interpretable characterization of tissue organization and pathological remodeling across heterogeneous biological systems.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
47.0%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
4
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.3%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.2%
8
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
9
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.6%
10
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
11
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
13
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
16
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
18
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
21
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 49%
0.5%