Back

Risk of apnoea-related cardiorespiratory instability in preterm infants is modulated by clinical, demographic and dynamic indicators

Chen, Y.; Ketheeswaranathan, V.; Fordington, S.; Baxter, L.; Stevens, F.; Zandvoort, C. S.; Gawthorpe, R.; Villarroel, M.; Berthouze, L.; Hartley, C.

2026-05-17 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.05.13.26353101 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Apnoea of prematurity is common and may cause desaturation and/or bradycardia. There is marked variability in infants cardiorespiratory responses to apnoea, despite standardised clinical thresholds. Factors influencing apnoea-related cardiorespiratory instability and whether instability can be predicted warrant investigation. Methods: 181,511 apnoeas >5 seconds were identified from continuous physiological recordings from 146 preterm infants <37 weeks postmenstrual age. Cardiorespiratory instability was defined as bradycardia (>30% heart rate reduction) and/or oxygen desaturation (<85%). Mixed-effects models assessed clinical, demographic and dynamic modulators of the relationship between apnoea duration and cardiorespiratory instability. Machine learning (XGBoost) was used to train models to predict apnoea-related cardiorespiratory instability. Results: Longer duration apnoeas were associated with increased instability, although variability was substantial and 3.6% of apnoeas <10 seconds were associated with cardiorespiratory instability, while 61.2% of apnoeas [&ge;]20 seconds were not. Multiple clinical/demographic (postmenstrual and gestational age, sex, weight z-score, and ventilation mode) and dynamic (baseline heart rate, oxygen saturation, and recent apnoea clustering) factors were associated with increased instability risk. Apnoea-related cardiorespiratory instability could be predicted with a balanced test accuracy of 75.8% when incorporating all features, while a model using only clinical/demographic features achieved 66.0%. Conclusions: Multiple factors influence cardiorespiratory responses to apnoea. Predictive modelling may enable personalised apnoea definitions, improving individualised care.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
8
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
9
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
15
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%