Back

Risk of apnoea-related cardiorespiratory instability in preterm infants is modulated by clinical, demographic and dynamic indicators

Chen, Y.; Ketheeswaranathan, V.; Fordington, S.; Baxter, L.; Stevens, F.; Zandvoort, C. S.; Gawthorpe, R.; Villarroel, M.; Berthouze, L.; Hartley, C.

2026-05-17 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.05.13.26353101 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Apnoea of prematurity is common and may cause desaturation and/or bradycardia. There is marked variability in infants cardiorespiratory responses to apnoea, despite standardised clinical thresholds. Factors influencing apnoea-related cardiorespiratory instability and whether instability can be predicted warrant investigation. Methods: 181,511 apnoeas >5 seconds were identified from continuous physiological recordings from 146 preterm infants <37 weeks postmenstrual age. Cardiorespiratory instability was defined as bradycardia (>30% heart rate reduction) and/or oxygen desaturation (<85%). Mixed-effects models assessed clinical, demographic and dynamic modulators of the relationship between apnoea duration and cardiorespiratory instability. Machine learning (XGBoost) was used to train models to predict apnoea-related cardiorespiratory instability. Results: Longer duration apnoeas were associated with increased instability, although variability was substantial and 3.6% of apnoeas <10 seconds were associated with cardiorespiratory instability, while 61.2% of apnoeas [&ge;]20 seconds were not. Multiple clinical/demographic (postmenstrual and gestational age, sex, weight z-score, and ventilation mode) and dynamic (baseline heart rate, oxygen saturation, and recent apnoea clustering) factors were associated with increased instability risk. Apnoea-related cardiorespiratory instability could be predicted with a balanced test accuracy of 75.8% when incorporating all features, while a model using only clinical/demographic features achieved 66.0%. Conclusions: Multiple factors influence cardiorespiratory responses to apnoea. Predictive modelling may enable personalised apnoea definitions, improving individualised care.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
2
Pediatric Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.0%
3
The Journal of Pediatrics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
4
BMJ Paediatrics Open
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.9%
6
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
8
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
9
Archives of Disease in Childhood
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
12
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.5%
15
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
17
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
24
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%