Back

Integrating Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention Through Repeated Assessment and Feedback: A Multisite Quality Improvement Initiative in Viet Nam

Nguyen, P. Q.; Tran, G. V.; Nguyen, Y. H.; Pham, O. T. P.; Nguyen, C. T.; Vu, D. M.; Tran, C. A.; Nguyen, D. T. N.; Nguyen, M. V.; Mai, H. B.; Vo, D. B.; Nguyen, B. T.; Vu, P. D.; Pham, V. T. T.; Hoang, N. T. B.; van Doorn, H. R.; Kesteman, T.; Vu, H.

2026-05-17 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.05.13.26353088 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and infection prevention and control (IPC) are complementary strategies to improve patient safety and address antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), they are often implemented separately, reducing effectiveness. Evidence on integrating AMS and IPC in routine hospital practice remains limited. Objective To evaluate the feasibility of an integrated AMS-IPC improvement approach and describe changes in implementation in Vietnamese hospitals. Methods We conducted a multisite quality improvement initiative in four hospitals within the national AMR surveillance network in Viet Nam (March-September 2025). We used US-CDC tools to guide the implementation, including the Global Antibiotic Stewardship Evaluation Tool (G-ASET) and the Infection Control Assessment and Response (ICAR) tool. Baseline assessments were followed by feedback, multidisciplinary action planning, and targeted capacity building. Follow-up occurred 2-5 months later. Changes were analysed descriptively using quantitative scores and qualitative synthesis, and reported following the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines. Results All hospitals had established IPC programmes at baseline, while AMS maturity varied. G-ASET scores improved across all sites, with greater gains in hospitals starting from lower baselines. Key improvements included leadership and governance, education and training, stewardship actions, and monitoring and reporting. IPC practices aligned with AMS priorities also improved, particularly transmission-based precautions, environmental cleaning, and cross-team coordination. Infrastructure-dependent areas, such as water safety, showed limited short-term progress. Conclusions An integrated AMS-IPC approach using repeated assessment and feedback is feasible and associated with meaningful improvements. This model offers a scalable strategy for strengthening hospital responses to AMR in LMICs and informs national programmes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
26.6%
2
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.9%
4
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
6
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
7
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.3%
8
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
10
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
Journal of Hospital Infection
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
21
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%