Back

Integrative single-cell profiling of melanoma reveals a tumor microenvironment signature predictive of immunotherapy response

Margelos, T.; Mina, I.; Tserga, A.; Goula, E.; Kondylis, S.; Vlahou, A.; Frantzi, M.

2026-05-17 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.13.26352980 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed cancer treatment, yet a large number of patients fail to respond. Identifying molecular characteristics that predict response before treatment initiation remains an unmet need. Towards that end, this study presents a large-scale integrative analysis of existing single-cell and bulk tissue datasets, aimed at identifying predictive features while providing insights into their cellular origin and potential function within the tumor microenvironment. Methods: A stepwise analysis was performed using single-cell RNA-sequencing data from 60 melanoma patients at baseline, separated into discovery (n=41) and validation (n=19) sets. An integrated bulk transcriptomics dataset (n=128) from melanoma patients and a bladder cancer dataset (n=298) were used for further validation. Results: Integrative analysis of melanoma single-cell datasets revealed that responders exhibit distinct molecular profiles across multiple cell types compared to non-responders. Notably, these included downregulation of the TNFR superfamily and other immunosuppressive genes (TNFRSF18, TNFRSF9, TNFRSF4, LGALS1, BATF, IL12RB2, LINGO1, DUSP4, SDC4, VCAM1) in T-cells. By investigating the findings from the immune cell populations in the bulk tumor context, 13 transcripts were found to be consistently associated with response across all cohorts. These were differentially expressed in T-cells (SELL, EPB41, CD96, UHFR2, LINGO1, LGALS1), B-cells (ALDH5A1), NK cells (PLEC, PDGFRB) and Monocytes (TLR10, ST6GAL1, IKZF1, MPRIP). A predictive model based on these features effectively discriminated responders from non-responders in melanoma (AUC=0.73). The model maintained significant predictive power in an independent bladder cancer dataset (IMvigor210; AUC=0.64). Of high clinical relevance, it demonstrated enhanced performance in identifying responders among patients with low tumor mutational burden (AUC=0.75). Conclusion: Our study reveals pre-treatment molecular features related to immune-cancer crosstalk that are associated with response to immunotherapy. A 13-gene model demonstrates potential added clinical value in stratifying responders, particularly in patients with low tumor mutational burden, meriting further validation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.8%
4
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
8
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
12
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
19
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
21
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
25
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%