What outcome information do women need to support an informed choice between planning a vaginal or caesarean birth? - a consensus study.
Ekong, A.; Nicoll, A.; Locock, L.; Fairley, T.; Devane, D.; McDonagh Hull, P.; Braithwaite, L.; Ade, M.; Hidvegi, I.; Saldias, N.; Taylor, G.; Williams, D.; Bhattacharya, S. B.; Black, M.
Show abstract
Background A mode of birth decision aid (DA) can provide information and support discussions about the potential risks and benefits (outcomes) associated with planning a vaginal or caesarean birth. Evidence shows that DAs can enhance patient knowledge, reduce decisional conflict, minimise inconsistencies in decision-making support, especially in maternity settings, and promote informed decision making. Despite these benefits, DAs specific to mode of birth are currently lacking in routine antenatal care. This paper outlines the process we followed to reach consensus on which outcomes of planned mode of birth should be included in a mode of birth DA. Methods Outcome identification and selection occurred in three phases. Phase 1 involved compiling a long list of outcomes from systematic reviews, the NICE Caesarean Birth Guidance and qualitative interviews with stakeholders. In Phase 2, this list was refined via a 2 round Delphi survey to prioritise outcomes considered important. An outcome reached consensus if [≥]70% of all participants, or 70% of women/partners rated it as critically important (7-9), and <15% rated it as not important (1-3). Phase 3 involved two stakeholder consensus meetings to finalise the outcome list. Results Seventy-one outcomes were identified. Following two Delphi rounds and consensus meetings, 54 outcomes were rated as critically important. Seventeen outcomes were consistently rated as not critical across both the survey and consensus phases, meaning that [≥]70% of participants in each phase did not consider them essential for informing women during pregnancy. Of these, 8 were retained due to NICE recommendations and ultimately, 9 outcomes were excluded. The final list included 44 maternal and 18 child outcomes. Maternal outcomes related to assistance with birth, complications at the time of birth, issues during recovery, pelvic floor, psychological issues, sexual function, and future pregnancy. Child outcomes related to morbidity and death, disease, obesity, issues with cognitive development and physical development. Conclusions Sixty-two priority outcomes were identified for inclusion in a planned mode of birth DA.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 97%
- Out-of-hospital births and the experiences of emergency ambulance clinicians and birthing parents: A scoping review of the literature 96%
- A collaborative maternity and newborn dashboard (CoMaND) for the COVID-19 pandemic: a protocol for timely, adaptive monitoring of perinatal outcomes in Melbourne, Australia 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 96%
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 96%
- Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Making maternity and neonatal care personalised in the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Babies Born Better Survey in the UK and the Netherlands 96%
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 96%
- A community-based mentoring scheme for pregnant and parenting adolescents in Sierra Leone: protocol for a hybrid pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Family-centered postnatal training and adherence to newborn care practices in district hospitals in two Indian states: A quasi-experimental intervention study 95%
- Evaluating the impact of an enhanced support implementation of the PReCePT (PRevention of Cerebral palsy in Pre-Term labour) quality improvement toolkit to increase the uptake of magnesium sulphate in pre-term deliveries for the prevention of neurodisabilities: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial 94%
- A mixed methods study of attitudes on location of gynaecological oncology outpatient care: a patient and healthcare professional questionnaire 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 96%
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 96%
- Advancing the Safe Motherhood Initiative: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of local physician’s perspectives on antibiotic self-medication during pregnancy in a low- and middle-income country 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.