Back

What outcome information do women need to support an informed choice between planning a vaginal or caesarean birth? - a consensus study.

Ekong, A.; Nicoll, A.; Locock, L.; Fairley, T.; Devane, D.; McDonagh Hull, P.; Braithwaite, L.; Ade, M.; Hidvegi, I.; Saldias, N.; Taylor, G.; Williams, D.; Bhattacharya, S. B.; Black, M.

2026-05-17 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.05.13.26352976 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background A mode of birth decision aid (DA) can provide information and support discussions about the potential risks and benefits (outcomes) associated with planning a vaginal or caesarean birth. Evidence shows that DAs can enhance patient knowledge, reduce decisional conflict, minimise inconsistencies in decision-making support, especially in maternity settings, and promote informed decision making. Despite these benefits, DAs specific to mode of birth are currently lacking in routine antenatal care. This paper outlines the process we followed to reach consensus on which outcomes of planned mode of birth should be included in a mode of birth DA. Methods Outcome identification and selection occurred in three phases. Phase 1 involved compiling a long list of outcomes from systematic reviews, the NICE Caesarean Birth Guidance and qualitative interviews with stakeholders. In Phase 2, this list was refined via a 2 round Delphi survey to prioritise outcomes considered important. An outcome reached consensus if [&ge;]70% of all participants, or 70% of women/partners rated it as critically important (7-9), and <15% rated it as not important (1-3). Phase 3 involved two stakeholder consensus meetings to finalise the outcome list. Results Seventy-one outcomes were identified. Following two Delphi rounds and consensus meetings, 54 outcomes were rated as critically important. Seventeen outcomes were consistently rated as not critical across both the survey and consensus phases, meaning that [&ge;]70% of participants in each phase did not consider them essential for informing women during pregnancy. Of these, 8 were retained due to NICE recommendations and ultimately, 9 outcomes were excluded. The final list included 44 maternal and 18 child outcomes. Maternal outcomes related to assistance with birth, complications at the time of birth, issues during recovery, pelvic floor, psychological issues, sexual function, and future pregnancy. Child outcomes related to morbidity and death, disease, obesity, issues with cognitive development and physical development. Conclusions Sixty-two priority outcomes were identified for inclusion in a planned mode of birth DA.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
22.8%
2
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
5
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
10
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
11
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
12
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
13
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
16
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
24
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%