A genome-wide deletion map in 125,730 individuals for novel rare disease gene and variant discovery
McGuigan, A.; Pagnamenta, A. T.; Covill, L. E.; Sampson, J.; Camps, C.; Chen, Y.; Moitra, T.; Chundru, V. K.; O'Heir, E.; Allan, K.; Arno, G.; Broomfield, A.; Delatycki, M.; Lin, S.; Michaelides, M.; Rius, R.; Roscioli, T.; Simons, C.; Webster, A.; White, S. M.; Wilson, L.; Sanders, S. J.; O'Donnell-Luria, A.; Ellingford, J. M.; Taylor, J. C.; Whiffin, N.
Show abstract
Structural variants (SVs) can disrupt gene function and contribute to pathogenesis of rare disorders. Here, we created a genome-wide knockout dataset across 125,730 individuals with genome sequencing data in the UK's National Genomic Research Library by leveraging the distinct read-depth signal associated with homozygous deletions. We curated 535,699 rare high-confidence homozygous deletion SVs, of which 48,735 were rare. These deletions collectively covered 213Mb or 6.92% of the human genome (4.58% of autosomal sequence), revealing substantial tolerance to complete sequence loss. From a subset of 58,022 individuals with rare disease, we identified 295 individuals with likely diagnostic homozygous deletions impacting protein-coding regions of known disease genes. A further 32 individuals had candidate non-coding SVs in or near to known disease genes, 19/32 (59.37%) of which disrupted 5-UTR/promoter regions, revealing promoter deletion as an underappreciated cause of rare disorders. Finally, we identify 43 genes with no known rare-disease association but with exonic homozygous deletions in two or more individuals with consistent phenotypes. We describe in detail PDC (phosducin) in Leber Congenital Amaurosis, GCG (glucagon) for a syndromic neurodevelopmental disorder with gastrointestinal involvement, and ENTPD3 for intellectual disability with autism, as candidate novel disease-associated genes. Overall, we create a genome-wide map of homozygous deletions and demonstrate the power of this dataset for rare disease diagnosis and novel disease-gene discovery.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting cryptic clinically-relevant structural variation in exome sequencing data increases diagnostic yield for developmental disorders 97%
- Non-coding variants upstream of MEF2C cause severe developmental disorder through three distinct loss-of-function mechanisms 97%
- The landscape of autosomal-recessive pathogenic variants in European populations reveals phenotype-specific effects 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dominant variants in major spliceosome U4 and U5 small nuclear RNA genes cause neurodevelopmental disorders through splicing disruption 96%
- The impact of rare protein coding genetic variation on adult cognitive function 95%
- Inferring compound heterozygosity from large-scale exome sequencing data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A systematic analysis of splicing variants identifies new diagnoses in the 100,000 Genomes Project. 96%
- Clustering of predicted loss-of-function variants in genes linked with monogenic disease can explain incomplete penetrance 96%
- Mendelian gene identification through mouse embryo viability screening 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Saturation genome editing of DDX3X clarifies pathogenicity of germline and somatic variation 98%
- Characterising the loss-of-function impact of 5’ untranslated region variants in 15,708 individuals 97%
- Diagnostic Utility of Genome-wide DNA Methylation Analysis in Genetically Unsolved Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies and Refinement of a CHD2 Episignature 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.